Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum. Adam Tomkins

rel="nofollow" href="#ulink_6e4b2d7e-21bc-546f-a76b-3c41e53c425a">[18]

      Patrick Birkinshaw, European Public Law, 2003, S. 172–174.

       [19]

      Gordon Anthony, UK Public Law and European Law, 2002, S. 78.

       [20]

      Stanley Alexander de Smith, The Constitution and the Common Market: A Tentative Appraisal, Modern Law Review 1971, S. 21.

       [21]

      Macarthys Ltd v. Smith [1979] 3 All ER 325.

       [22]

      [2002] 1 CMLR 50, 101.

       [23]

      Sean Greenwood, Britain and European Integration since the Second World War, 1996, S. 5.

       [24]

      Stephen George, An Awkward Partner. Britain in the European Community, 1990, S. 21.

       [25]

      George (Fn. 24), S. 15.

       [26]

      George (Fn. 24), S. 28.

       [27]

      George (Fn. 24), S. 34.

       [28]

      Zitiert bei Elisabeth Barker, The Common Market, 1976, S. 76–77, sowie bei George (Fn. 24), S. 34.

       [29]

      George (Fn. 24), S. 40.

       [30]

      George (Fn. 24), S. 1.

       [31]

      Ian Ward, The English Constitution: Myths and Realities, 2004, S. 135.

       [32]

      Anthony Bradley, in: Jowell/Oliver (Hg.), The Changing Constitution, 2004, S. 29.

       [33]

      Macarthys v. Smith [1979] 3 All ER 325, 329.

       [34]

      Richard Rawling, Legal Politics: the United Kingdom and Ratification of the Treaty on European Union. Part I, Public Law 1994, S. 254, 278.

       [35]

      Genau genommen gibt es englisches, walisisches, schottisches und nordirisches Recht. Einige Gesetze finden im gesamten Vereinigten Königreich Anwendung.

       [36]

      Murray Hunt, Using Human Rights Law in English Courts, 1997, S. 56–58.

       [37]

      Birkinshaw (Fn. 18), S. 184.

       [38]

      Vaughne Miller, The Extension of Qualified Majority Voting from the Treaty of Rome to the European Constitution, House of Commons Library Research Paper 05/54 vom 7.7.2004, S. 8.

       [39]

      White Paper: „A Constitutional Treaty for the EU: the British approach to the European Union Intergovernmental Conference 2003“, Cm 5937, September 2003, S. 66.

       [40]

      Siehe Fn. 31.

       [41]

      [1979] 3 All ER 325. Dazu Trevor Robert Seaward Allan, Parliamentary Sovereignty: Lord Denning’s Dexterous Revolution, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 3 (1983), S. 22.

       [42]

      [1983] 2 AC 751.

       [43]

      [1983] 2 AC 751, 771.

       [44]

      EuGH, Rs. 14/83, Slg. 1984, S. 1891 – von Colson/Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.

       [45]

      [1988] AC 618.

       [46]

      [1988] AC 618, 638–41.

       [47]

      [1996] 2 CMLR 990.

       [48]

      R v. Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No. 2) [1991] 1 All ER 70.

       [49]

      [1989] 2 All ER 692 (HL).

       [50]

      Die Rechtslage hat sich seither geändert, siehe M v. Home Office [1994] 1 AC 377.

       [51]

      EuGH, Rs. C-213/89, Slg. 1990, I-2433 – The Queen/Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame.

       [52]

      R v. Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No. 2) [1991] 1 All ER 70.

       [53]

      EuGH, Rs. C-221/89, Slg. 1991, I-3905 – The Queen/Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame.

       [54]

      R

Скачать книгу