Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum. Adam Tomkins. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Adam Tomkins
Издательство: Bookwire
Серия:
Жанр произведения:
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9783811489028
Скачать книгу
12.8.2005.

       [123]

      Gareth Crossman, Reconciling freedom with security, New Law Journal, 5.8.2005, S. 1193.

       [124]

      Pressekonferenz des Prime Minister, 5.8.2005.

       [125]

      A. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, Modern Law Review 2005, S. 654.

       [126]

      HC vol. 372, col. 925 (15.10.2001).

       [127]

      Stephen Tierney, Determining the State of Exception: What Role for Parliament and the Courts?, Modern Law Review 2005, S. 668, 671f.

       [128]

      Siehe z.B. R v. A (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 25.

       [129]

      White Paper „Rights Brought Home: the Human Rights Bill“, Cm 3782 (1997), Abs. 2.13.

       [130]

      Abschnitt 4 (6) (b) Human Rights Act 1998.

       [131]

      Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill, Oktober 1997, Cm 3782, Kapitel 2.4.

       [132]

      Siehe z.B. Lord Bingham, A New Supreme Court for the United Kingdom. The Constitution Unit Spring lecture 2002, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/files/90.pdf (28.4.2006); A Department for Constitutional Affairs Consultation Paper, Constitutional Reform: a new way of Appointing Judges CP 10/03, Constitutional Reform: A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom (CP 11/03), 14.7.2003.

       [133]

      Siehe www.dca.gov.uk/constitution/reform/pubs.htm (28.3.2006).

       [134]

      New QC scheme to put customer first, 26.5.2004, http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page1.asp (26.4.2006).

       [135]

      Teil 2 des Constitutional Reform Act 2005.

       [136]

      Robert Stevens, Reform in haste and repent at leisure, Legal Studies 24 (2004), S. 30 m.w.N.

       [137]

      Brenda Hale, A Supreme court for the United Kingdom?, Legal Studies 24 (2004), Ausgaben 1 und 2, Constitutional Innovations: the Creation of a Supreme Court for the UK; Domestic, Comparative and International Reflections. A Special Issue, S. 36.

       [138]

      Lord Woolf, The Rule of Law and a Change in the Constitution. Squire Centenary Lecture. Cambridge University. 3.3.2004, S. 8, www.dca.gov.uk/judicial/speeches/lcj030304.htm (28.3.2006).

       [139]

      Lord Woolf (Fn. 138), S. 2, 9, 11.

       [140]

      Vgl. Lord Woolf, Lionel Cohen Lecture, Jerusalem 2.12.2003, http://www.dca.gov.uk/judicial/speeches/lcj021203.htm (26.4.2006).

       [141]

      8 BHRC 56, The Times, 22.2.2000.

       [142]

      2000 Justiciary Cases (in: Session Cases) 208.

       [143]

      Diana Woodhouse, The Constitutional and Political Implications of a UK Supreme Court, Legal Studies 24 (2004), Ausgaben 1 und 2, Constitutional Innovations: the Creation of a Supreme Court for the UK; Domestic, Comparative and International Reflections. A Special Issue, S. 134; Andrew Le Sueur/Richard Cornes, The Future of the United Kingdom’s Highest Courts, 2001, S. 126ff.; siehe auch Jutta Limbach, Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution, Modern Law Review 2001, S. 1, mit Hinweisen auf das deutsche Bundestagswahlsystem; Anthony King, Does the United Kingdom still have a constitution?, 2001, S. 70; Craig (Fn. 58), S. 102, benutzt den Begriff der „Kompetenz-Kompetenz“.

       [144]

      Constitutional Reform: A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom, CP 11/03, Juli 2003, Abs. 20.

       [145]

      Robert Stevens, The English Judges. Their Role in the Changing Constitution, 2002, S. 10.

       [146]

      Cm 3782 (1997).

       [147]

      Abschnitt 2.12.

       [148]

      White Paper, Abschnitt 1.14.

       [149]

      Martina Künnecke, The impact of the decision by the European Court of Human Rights in Z v. UK on the development of the liability of public bodies in the UK, European Public Law 8 (2002), S. 25, 28, 31.

       [150]

      [2001] 2 AC 550.

       [151]

      EGMR, Nr. 23452/94, Urteil vom 28.10.1998, Rep. 1998-VIII; auch veröffentlicht in [1999] 1 FLR 193.

       [152]

      EGMR, Nr. 29392/95, Urteil vom 10.5.2001, Rep. 2001-V; auch veröffentlicht in [2001] 2 FLR 612.

       [153]

      [2001] 2 FLR 612, Abschnitt 100.

       [154]

      Lord Irvine