Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum. Adam Tomkins

[87]

      Per Lord Justice Diplock, in: Salomon v. Commissioners of Custom and Excise [1967] 2 QB 116.

       [88]

      Lord Lester of Herne Hill/Lydia Clapinska, Human Rights and the British Constitution, in: Jowell/Oliver (Fn. 32), S. 70 m.w.N.

       [89]

      Helen Fenwick, Civil Liberties and Human Rights, 2002, S. 114.

       [90]

      [1990] 1 AC 109.

       [91]

      Colin Turpin, British Government and Constitution, 2002, S. 165.

       [92]

      Sir Edward Gardner QC, HC Debates, Bd. 109, Sp. 1224 (6.2.1987) sowie z.B. Lord Goff, in: Att. Gen. v. Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1988] 3 All ER 545.

       [93]

      [1995] 4 All ER 400, 422 h-j.

       [94]

      Anthony Lester, Fundamental Rights: The United Kingdom Isolated?, Public Law 1984, S. 46.

       [95]

      Lester (Fn. 94), S. 49; Geoffrey Marston, The United Kingdom’s part in the preparation of the European Convention on Human Rights, 1950, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1993, S. 796.

       [96]

      Marston (Fn. 95), S. 808.

       [97]

      Marston (Fn. 95), S. 810.

       [98]

      Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill Cm. 3782 (HMSO, 1997).

       [99]

      Siehe www.dca.gov.uk (28.3.2006).

       [100]

      Diese Abteilung kann einem Justizministerium gleichgesetzt werden.

       [101]

      Equality Bill which establishes a Commission for Equality and Human Rights (CEHR).

       [102]

      Michael Douglas, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Northern Shell plc v. Hello! Ltd [2001] 2 WLR 992.

       [103]

      Wadham/Mountfield/Edmundson (Hg.), Blackstone’s Guide to The Human Rights Act 1998, 2003, S. 98 m.w.N.

       [104]

      EuGH, Verb. Rs. C-6 und 9/90, Slg. 1991, I-5357 – Francovich und Bonifaci/Italien; Verb. Rs. C-46 und 48/93, Slg. 1996, I-1029 – Brasserie du Pêcheur und R/Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame; auch veröffentlicht in [1996] QB 404.

       [105]

      Richard Clayton, Damage Limitation: The Courts and the Human Rights Act Damages, Public Law 2005, S. 429, 430.

       [106]

      Law Commission, Report No. 266, Damages under the Human Rights Act, Cm 4853 (2000).

       [107]

      [2003] EWCA Civ 1406; [2004] QB 1124.

       [108]

      Diese waren nicht unumstritten, siehe z.B. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ex p Greenfield [2005] UKHL 14.

       [109]

      R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ex p Greenfield [2005] UKHL 14, Abs. 2.6.

       [110]

      Richard Clayton, Damage Limitation: The Courts and the Human Rights Act Damages, Public Law 2005, S. 429, 435.

       [111]

      Wadham/Mountfield/Edmundson (Fn. 103), S. 102.

       [112]

      [2004] UKHL 30, Abs. 49–50. Siehe auch www.humanrights.gov.uk/decihm.htm (28.3.2005).

       [113]

      [2001] UKHL 23.

       [114]

      [2003] UKHL 40.

       [115]

      [2001] EWCA Civ 415.

       [116]

      [2002] 3 WLR 344.

       [117]

      A (FC) and Others (FC) v. Secretary of State [2004] UKHL 56, Belmarsh-Entscheidung.

       [118]

      Abschnitt 23 Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001.

       [119]

      Abs. 42.

       [120]

      Deirdre M. Dwyer, Rights Brought Home, Law Quarterly Review 121 (2005), S. 359.

       [121]

      The Independent, Editorial, 12.8.2005.

       [122]

      The