Contratos. Freddy Escobar-Rozas

between a purpose you hold and an action that would promote it to be a reason for you to perform the action. But this connection must be universalizable if the reason is sufficient. Only in this case have you identified a law. If universalization would destroy the connection between action and purpose, the purpose is not a sufficient reason for the action. This is how, on the Practical Contradiction Interpretation, the contradiction in conception test shows an immoral maxim to be unfit to be an objective practical law. As an autonomous rational being, you must act on your conception of a law. This is why autonomy requires conformity to the Formula of Universal Law” (Korsgaard, 1996, p. 102).

      77 Kant denomina “dignidad” a este estado moral especial que otorga la capacidad de definir (i) el destino propio y (ii) las formas de realizarlo.

      78 Existe una diferencia entre propiedad como “titularidad” y propiedad como “derecho real”. La propiedad como “titularidad” está representada por la relación de pertenencia o correspondencia entre un sujeto de derechos y un derecho subjetivo. Esa relación permite que el sujeto en cuestión pueda disponer del derecho indicado. La propiedad como “derecho real” está representada por la más amplia gama de atribuciones sobre un recurso (uso, disfrute, modificación, destrucción).

      Fundamentos

      Legales

      (primera parte)

      “Conflicting moralities serve as checks against the tyranny of singular truth. I would not want to live in a world in which Jeremy Bentham’s or even John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism reigned supreme to the exclusion of all Kantian and neo-Kantian approaches; nor I would like to live in an entirely Kantian world in which categorical imperatives were always slavishly followed. Bentham serves as a check on Kant and vice versa, just as religion serves as a check on science, science on religion, socialism on capitalism, capitalism on socialism. Rights serve as a check on democracy, and democracy as a check on rights”

      Alan Dershowitz (2005)