Clinical Pancreatology for Practising Gastroenterologists and Surgeons. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Медицина
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119570141
Скачать книгу
Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y, et al. Relationship between post‐ERCP pancreatitis and the change of serum amylase level after the procedure. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13:3855–3860.

      61 61 Avgerinos DV, Llaguna OH, Lo AY, et al. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: related duodenal perforations. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:833–838.

      62 62 Morgan KA, Fontenot BB, Ruddy JM, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography gut perforations: when to wait! When to operate! Am Surg 2009; 75:477–483; discussion 483–484.

      63 63 Dumonceau J‐M, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ, et al. Prophylaxis of post‐ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline, updated June 2014. Endoscopy 2014; 46:799–815.

      64 64 Aktas H, Mensink PBF, Haringsma J, et al. Low incidence of hyperamylasemia after proximal double‐balloon enteroscopy: has the insertion technique improved? Endoscopy 2009; 41:670–673.

      65 65 Aktas H, de Ridder L, Haringsma J, et al. Complications of single‐balloon enteroscopy: a prospective evaluation of 166 procedures. Endoscopy 2010; 42:365–368.

      66 66 Delhaye M, Engelholm L, Cremer M. Pancreas divisum: congenital anatomic variant or anomaly? Contribution of endoscopic retrograde dorsal pancreatography. Gastroenterology 1985; 89:951–958.

      67 67 Garg PK, Khajuria R, Kabra M, et al. Association of SPINK1 gene mutation and CFTR gene polymorphisms in patients with pancreas divisum presenting with idiopathic pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43:848–852.

      68 68 Nagpal SJS, Peeraphatdit T, Sannapaneni SK, et al. Clinical spectrum of adult patients with annular pancreas: findings from a large single institution cohort. Pancreatology 2019; 19:290–295.

      69 69 Jagannath S, Garg PK. Recurrent acute pancreatitis: current concepts in the diagnosis and management. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2018; 16:449–465.

       David X. Jin1,2, Peter A. Banks1,2, and Julia McNabb‐Baltar1,2

      1 Brigham and Women’s Hospital

       2 Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

      The clinical severity and complications of acute pancreatitis (AP) can be highly variable. While the majority of patients develop a mild course, 5–15% develop severe disease, with mortality approaching 50% in some cases [1–8]. This clinical variability led to a need for accepted definitions of severity and complications to aid study and guide management.

      The AC served as the first clinically based classification system and provided the framework for how AP is defined today. However, some of the definitions proved ambiguous and were used inconsistently, for example (i) a uniform serum lipase and/or amylase threshold for diagnosis was not established; (ii) transient and persistent organ failure were not differentiated; and (iii) a heterogeneous group of patients with varying severity and mortality were combined into a single severe AP category [10]. These limitations led to large variability in the interpretation of organ failure and local complications [10,11].

      With better understanding of the pathophysiology of organ failure and pancreatic necrosis, two widely adopted classification systems were subsequently derived: the Revised Atlanta Classification (RAC) and Determinant‐Based Classification (DBC) [12,13].

      The RAC was derived through an iterative consultation process, ultimately generating consensus recommendations from the members of 11 international pancreatic societies [12]. The RAC provides a comprehensive classification of AP, including definitions of diagnosis, type (interstitial edematous versus necrotizing pancreatitis), clinical phase (early versus late), complications (local and systemic), and severity (mild, moderately severe, or severe). The scope of this chapter focuses on individual complications and definitions of severity.

      Definition of Organ Failure and Complications in Acute Pancreatitis

      Organ Failure

      Source: adapted from Bradley [9].

Atlanta Classification Mild No organ failure and no local complications
Severe Organ failure and/or local complications
Revised Atlanta Classification Mild No organ failure and no local or systemic complications
Moderately severe Transient organ failure and/or local and/or systemic complications
Severe Persistent organ failure
Determinant‐Based Classification Mild No organ failure and no necrosis
Moderate Transient organ failure and/or sterile necrosis
Severe Persistent organ failure or infected necrosis
Critical Persistent organ failure and infected necrosis

      Local Complications

      Local complications typically refer to a variety of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections that differ in both composition and time to development. Other local complications include gastric outlet dysfunction, splanchnic vein thrombosis, and colonic necrosis. Local complications should be suspected when there is persistence or recurrence of pain, organ