Clinical Pancreatology for Practising Gastroenterologists and Surgeons. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Медицина
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119570141
Скачать книгу
in 19% [104] and in 38% mainly in alcoholics as reported by Lankisch et al. [105].

      The risk of pancreatic cancer after a primary episode of AP was reported by Rijkers et al. [106] in 731 patients who were followed for a median of 55 months. Pancreatic cancer incidence rate (per 1000 patient‐years) in the group who progressed to chronic pancreatitis was 9.0 compared with 1.1 in those did not progress to chronic pancreatitis. The median time to developing pancreatic cancer was 47 months in those with chronic pancreatitis and 12 months in those who did not have chronic pancreatitis. One wonders if the AP was secondary to the underlying pancreatic cancer in this group without chronic pancreatitis. No comparative group was utilized in this study [106].

      A follow‐up, nationwide, matched cohort study from Denmark by Kirkegard et al. [108] found that patients with AP had increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Their risk for developing pancreatic cancer decreased with time but was still elevated at two and five years post episode and this included a three‐year washout period to reduce the likelihood of including prevalent cases of pancreatic cancer. Thus, we must continue to follow up and search for an underlying neoplasm in patients with AP who are older than 40 years of age, irrespective of the presumed cause of their AP. The reason(s) for this association may be similar etiologies, including alcohol, smoking, diet, diabetes, and obesity [109].

      Thus, patients with a history of AP regardless of cause should likely undergo screening for pancreatic cancer in the five years after their initial episode.

      1 1 Gapp J, Hall AG, Walters RW, et al. Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations related to acute pancreatitis. Epidemiology from 2001 to 2014 in the United States. Pancreas 2019; 48(4):548–554.

      2 2 Afghani E, Pandol SJ, Shimosegawa T, et al. Acute pancreatitis: progress and challenges. A report on an international symposium. Pancreas 2015; 44:1195–1210.

      3 3 Roberts SE, Morrison‐Rees S, John A, et al. The incidence and etiology of acute pancreatitis across Europe. Pancreatology 2017; 17:155–165.

      4 4 Brindise E, Elkhatib I, Kuruvilla A, Silva R. Temporal trends in incidence and outcomes of acute pancreatitis in hospitalized patients in the United States. Pancreas 2019; 48:169–175.

      5 5 Krishna SG, Kamboj AK, Hart PA, et al. The changing epidemiology of acute pancreatitis hospitalizations: a decade of trends and the impact of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2017; 46:482–488.

      6 6 Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic diseases in the United States: Update 2018. Gastroenterology 2019; 156:254–272.

      7 7 Barkin JA, Nemeth Z, Saluja AK, Barkin JS. Cannabis‐induced acute pancreatitis: a systematic review. Pancreas 2017; 46:1035–1038.

      8 8 Ardengh JC, Malheiros CA, Rahl F, et al. Microlithiasis of the gallbladder: role of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with idiopathic pancreatitis. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2010; 56(1):27–31.

      9 9 Vila JJ. Endoscopic ultrasonography and idiopathic acute pancreatitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2:107–111.

      10 10 Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post‐ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:1781–1788.

      11 11 Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70:80–88.

      12 12 Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S, et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89(6):1075–1105.e15.

      13 13 De Lisi S, Leandro G, Buscarini E. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23:367–374.

      14 14 Makary MA, Duncan MD, Harmon JW, et al. The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2005; 241:119–124

      15 15 Wan J, Ouyang Y, Yu C, et al. Comparison of EUS with MRCP in idiopathic acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:1180–1188.

      16 16 Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi M. Role of endoscopic evaluation in idiopathic pancreatitis: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:1037–1045.

      17 17 Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, et al. Detection of bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography and helical‐computed‐tomography cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 2005; 54:271–275.

      18 18 Savides TJ. EUS‐guided ERCP for patients with intermediate probability for choledocholithiasis: is it time for all of us to start doing this? Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67:669–672.

      19 19 Khatua B, El Kurdi B, Singh VP. Obesity and pancreatitis. Curr Opinion Gastroenterol 2017; 33:374–382.

      20 20 Camilleri M, Malhi H, Acosta A. Gastrointestinal complications of obesity. Gastroenterology 2017; 152(7):1656–1670.

      21 21 Dobszai D, Mάtrai, Erỡss B, et al. Body‐mass index correlates with severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis: a meta‐analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:729–743.

      22 22 Natu A, Stevens T, Kang L, et al. Visceral adiposity predicts severity of acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2017; 46:776–781.

      23 23 Choi JS, Yi S‐W, Park JW, et al. Body mass index and the risk of acute pancreatitis by etiology: a prospective analysis of Korean National Screening Cohort. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34(3):603–611.

      24 24 Molitch ME. Diabetes mellitus. In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW (eds) Clinical Methods: The History, Physical and Laboratory Examinations, 3rd edn. Boston: Butterworths, 1990, chapter 136.

      25 25 Albai O, Roman D, Frandes M, et al. Hyperglyceridemia, an important and independent risk factor for acute pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2017; 13:515–522.

      26 26 Garg R, Rustagi T. Management of hypertriglyceridemia‐induced acute pancreatitis. BioMed Res Int 2018; 2018:4721357.

      27 27 Yin G, Cang X, Yu G, et al. Different clinical presentations of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Pancreas 2015; 44:1105–1110.

      28 28 Elkouly MA, Salazar MJ, Simons‐Linares R. Hypertriglyceridemia‐associated drug‐induced acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2019; 48(1):22–35.

      29 29 Pedersen SB, Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG. Non‐fasting mild‐to‐moderate hyperglyceridemia and risk of acute pancreatitis. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176(12):1834–1842.

      30 30 Vipperla K, Sommerville C, Furlan A et al. Clinical profile and natural course in a large cohort of patients with hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 51:77–85.

      31 31 Wang Q, Wang G, Qiu Z, et al. Elevated serum triglycerides in the prognostic assessment of acute pancreatitis. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. J Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 51:586–593

      32 32 Sue LY, Batech M, Yadav D, et al. Effect of serum triglycerides on clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis: findings from a regional integrated health care system. Pancreas 2017; 46:874–879.

      33 33 Nawaz H, Koutroumpakis E, Easler J, et al. Elevated serum triglycerides are independently