Learning Outcomes A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Зарубежная деловая литература
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781867459040
Скачать книгу
As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?

      <--- Score

      61. What do you need to start doing?

      <--- Score

      62. What needs to be done?

      <--- Score

      63. Consider your own Learning outcomes project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?

      <--- Score

      64. Who needs to know?

      <--- Score

      65. Who else hopes to benefit from it?

      <--- Score

      66. When a Learning outcomes manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?

      <--- Score

      67. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Learning outcomes?

      <--- Score

      68. What does Learning outcomes success mean to the stakeholders?

      <--- Score

      69. What is the recognized need?

      <--- Score

      70. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Learning outcomes research related to market response and models?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Learning outcomes Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How do you catch Learning outcomes definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      2. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Learning outcomes leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      3. How do you hand over Learning outcomes context?

      <--- Score

      4. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      5. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      6. How do you gather Learning outcomes requirements?

      <--- Score

      7. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      8. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      9. What system do you use for gathering Learning outcomes information?

      <--- Score

      10. How do you think the partners involved in Learning outcomes would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      11. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      12. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      13. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      14. Who approved the Learning outcomes scope?

      <--- Score

      15. How did the Learning outcomes manager receive input to the development of a Learning outcomes improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      16. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      17. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      18. Is Learning outcomes currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      19. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      20. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      21. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      22. Is the Learning outcomes scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      23. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      24. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      26. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      27. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      29. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      30. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      31. Is there any additional Learning outcomes definition of success?

      <--- Score

      32. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      33. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      34. What are the core elements of the Learning outcomes business case?

      <--- Score

      35. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      36. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      37. Who are the Learning outcomes improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      38. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Learning outcomes? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      39. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      40.