40. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
41. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
42. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
43. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
44. What is your Organizational communications quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
45. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
46. What are the costs of delaying Organizational communications action?
<--- Score
47. Will Organizational communications have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
48. How do you verify and validate the Organizational communications data?
<--- Score
49. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
50. Are missed Organizational communications opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
51. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
52. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
53. What potential environmental factors impact the Organizational communications effort?
<--- Score
54. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
55. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
56. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
57. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
58. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
59. At what cost?
<--- Score
60. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
61. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
62. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
63. Does a Organizational communications quantification method exist?
<--- Score
64. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
65. How do your measurements capture actionable Organizational communications information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
66. Is the cost worth the Organizational communications effort ?
<--- Score
67. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
68. Do you have any cost Organizational communications limitation requirements?
<--- Score
69. How can a Organizational communications test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
70. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
71. Are the Organizational communications benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
72. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
73. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
74. How do you measure efficient delivery of Organizational communications services?
<--- Score
75. How is the value delivered by Organizational communications being measured?
<--- Score
76. Are there competing Organizational communications priorities?
<--- Score
77. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
78. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
79. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
80. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
81. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
82. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
83. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
84. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
85. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
86. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
87. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
88. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
89. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
90. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
91. How will you measure your Organizational communications effectiveness?
<--- Score
92. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
93. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
94. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
95. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
96. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
97. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
98. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
99. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
100. Among the Organizational communications product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to