60. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
61. Which information does the Technical efficiency business case need to include?
<--- Score
62. Are there Technical efficiency problems defined?
<--- Score
63. What does Technical efficiency success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
64. Do you know what you need to know about Technical efficiency?
<--- Score
65. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
66. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
67. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
68. Think about the people you identified for your Technical efficiency project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
69. Why the need?
<--- Score
70. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
71. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
72. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
73. How are training requirements identified?
<--- Score
74. How do you recognize an Technical efficiency objection?
<--- Score
75. Do you need to avoid or amend any Technical efficiency activities?
<--- Score
76. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
77. How are the Technical efficiency’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
78. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
79. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
80. When a Technical efficiency manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
81. What are the Technical efficiency resources needed?
<--- Score
82. For your Technical efficiency project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
83. Which issues are too important to ignore?
<--- Score
84. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
85. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
86. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
87. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
88. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
89. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
90. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Technical efficiency research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
91. What are your needs in relation to Technical efficiency skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
92. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
93. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
94. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Technical efficiency Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What is the context?
<--- Score
2. Is there any additional Technical efficiency definition of success?
<--- Score
3. What system do you use for gathering Technical efficiency information?
<--- Score
4. Has a Technical efficiency requirement not been met?
<--- Score
5. How have you defined all Technical efficiency requirements first?
<--- Score
6. How will the Technical efficiency team and the group measure complete success of Technical efficiency?
<--- Score
7. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
8. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Technical efficiency? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
9. Is there a critical path to deliver Technical efficiency results?
<--- Score
10. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
11. What are the Technical efficiency use cases?
<--- Score
12. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
13. What happens if Technical efficiency’s scope changes?
<--- Score
14. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
15.