Magma Redox Geochemistry. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Физика
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119473244
Скачать книгу
in this study is available in the data library associated with this publication (Cottrell et al., 2021).

      3.3.1. Fe‐Based Oxybarometry

       Mid‐Ocean Ridges.

Tectonic setting δQFM (s) Lithology n Method Activity‐composition models and other method notes Method error in fO2 in log units Notes Data included
mid‐ocean ridge –0.17 (0.15) basalt pillow glass 160 XANES At 1atm. Kress & Carmichael, 1991; parameterization of fO2 as a function of composition 0.27 Fe oxidation state determined using the Mössbauer calibration of Zhang et al., 2018 Cottrell & Kelley, 2011; Le Voyer et al., 2015 (except the 6 analyses of hydrothermally altered dredge 16D); Birner et al., 2018
mid‐ocean ridge 0.19 (0.36) basalt pillow glass 42 XANES At 1atm. O’Neill et al., 2018; parameterization of fO2 as a function of composition 0.52 Fe oxidation state determined using the Mössbauer calibration of Berry et al., 2018 O’Neill et al., 2018
mid‐ocean ridge 0.16 (–) lava 1 mag‐ilm pairs fO2 at T recorded and 1 atm. Ghiorso & Evans 2008 0.25** passes Bacon & Hirschmann, 1988, test for equilibrium Mazzullo & Bence, 1976
mid‐ocean ridge 0.31 (0.73) peridotite 72 sp‐oxybarometry fO2 at T and 0.6GPa. Mattioli & Wood, 1988; and Wood & Virgo, 1989; with aFe3O4 from Sack & Ghiorso, 1991a, 1991b; http://melts.ofm‐research.org/CalcForms/index.html; Temperature from spinel‐olivine Fe‐Mg exchange thermometer of Li et al., 1995 Between about +0.6/–1.0 and ±0.2 depending on spinel Fe3+/∑Fe ratio of spinel (see Methods Appendix and Davis et al., 2017)*** see Davis et al., 2017; and Birner et al. 2017; for discussions of a‐X model choices Bryndzia & Wood, 1990; Birner et al., 2018
back arc basin spreading center 0.22 (0.30) submarine lava 37 XANES at 1atm and 1200°C. Kress & Carmichael, 1991 0.27 Kelley & Cottrell, 2009; Brounce et al., 2014
arc front 0.96 (0.39) basalt glass in olivine‐hosted inclusions, basalt pillow glass 119 XANES at 1atm and 1200°C. Kress & Carmichael, 1991 0.27 Bonnin‐Mosbah, 2001; Kelley & Cottrell, 2009; Kelley & Cottrell, 2012; Brounce et al., 2014; Brounce et al., 2016 (data from Gaetani et al., 2012, excluded from average due to oxidative beam damage)
arc front 1.28 (0.64) volcanics (lavas and tephra) 114 mag‐ilm pairs fO2 at T recorded and 1 atm. Ghiroso & Evans, 2008 0.25** passes Bacon & Hirschmann, 1988, test for equilibrium Carmichael, 1967; Luhr & Carmichael, 1980; Wallace & Carmichael, 1994; Rutherford & Devine, 1996; Mandeville et al., 1996; Luhr, 2000; Coombs & Gardner, 2001; Devine et al., 2003; Costa et al., 2004; Grove et al., 2005; Larsen, 2006; Toothill et al., 2007; Izbekov et al., 2002; Browne et al., 2010; Baggerman & Debari, 2011; Crabtree & Lange, 2011; Stelten & Cooper, 2012; Arce et al., 2013; Waters & Lange, 2013; Howe et al., 2014; Frey & Lange, 2011; Muir et al., 2014; Waters et al., 2015; Grocke et al., 2016; Crabtree & Waters, 2017; Waters & Frey, 2018
arc front 0.96 (0.81) peridotite xenoliths 47 sp‐oxybarometry fO2 at T and 0.6GPa. Mattioli & Wood, 1988; and Wood & Virgo, 1989; with aFe3O4 from Sack & Ghiorso, 1991a, 1991b; http://melts.ofm‐research.org/CalcForms/index.html; Temperature from spinel‐olivine Fe‐Mg exchange thermometer of Li et al., 1995 Between about +0.6/–1.0 and ±0.2 depending on spinel Fe3+/∑Fe ratio of spinel (see Methods Appendix and Davis et al., 2017)*** see Davis et al., 2017; and Birner et al., 2017; for discussions of a‐X model choices Wood & Virgo, 1989; Canil, 1990; Brandon & Draper, 1996; Parkinson et al., 2003; Bénard et al., 2018
forearc 0.22 (0.75) trench wall peridotite and peridotite xenoliths 64 sp‐oxybarometry fO2 at T and 0.6GPa. Mattioli & Wood, 1988; and Wood & Virgo, 1989; with aFe3O4 from Sack & Ghiorso, 1991a, 1991b; http://melts.ofm‐research.org/CalcForms/index.html; Temperature from spinel‐olivine Fe‐Mg exchange thermometer of Li et al., 1995 Between about +0.6/–1.0 and ±0.2 depending on spinel Fe3+/∑Fe ratio of spinel (see Methods Appendix and Davis et al., 2017)*** see Davis et al., 2017; and Birner et al., 2017; for discussions of a‐X model choices Parkinson & Pearce, 1998; Pearce et al., 2000; Birner et al., 2017
plume 0.10* (0.71) basalt pillow glass

e-mail: [email protected]