A Guide to the Scientific Career. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Биология
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781118907269
Скачать книгу
the affect that the surrounding environment has on communication. Feeling uncomfortable due to temperature, location, and surrounding noise can all have a negative influence on effective communication. If you can, control the environment in which the communication takes place. If you cannot, take into account these factors (Pfeiffer 1998).

      In the previous section, we discussed general principles of effective communication. We focused on communication between two or more people engaged in a conversation. However, these lessons can apply beyond simple conversations to written communications or various sorts of group communication. In this final section, we will examine some situations that are especially relevant to those in the scientific and/or medical community.

      12.3.1 Written Communications

      One of the major forms of communication in the scientific community is through publications. You will likely communicate via formal written communication − papers and posters, for example − throughout your career. In order to communicate effectively, you must apply the tenets of effective communication above to your writing. This includes clarity, honesty, and brevity in preparing scientific papers. You must ensure that your papers effectively communicate the message without overstating your findings. A number of chapters deal with the specifics of how to achieve these goals in the various parts of the formal scientific paper.

      Other important written communications are less formal. Among the most common are email and text message communications. You will likely communicate daily with colleagues through email. Again, you can refer to the general description of effective communication above. There are, however, a few points that relate specifically to email communication. When writing an email or text, you must consider the context and the status of the person you are writing to. For example, while informal greetings and words may be appropriate when communicating with peers at the same level, communication with a supervisor or with the head of a department (or any time you do not know the person well) should be more formal. For those communications, it is important to make sure you have used correct grammar and spelling and an appropriate title (e.g. Dr. Smith versus Joe). You should also avoid greetings such as “Hey” or “Hi” unless the person is a close peer. Finally, you should avoid abbreviations of words such as “u” for “you” or “2” for “to” in these more formal email communications. Once again, in these types of communication you must consider the audience and your relationship to them.

      Email communication is instant and thus allows us more interaction with people than ever before. General guidelines for response times include 24–48 hours during the business week. On weekends or during holidays, you should be understanding if a response takes longer.

      12.3.2 Informal Meetings

      Setting a positive tone is important to prevent the development of an idea that a meeting that takes place on a weekly basis is not useful. If that happens, people will come to the meeting with an idea that this is a waste of their time, already setting the stage for ineffective communication. If you are in the position as head of a lab, keeping the meeting to a scheduled time, making sure everyone has the opportunity to talk and express their ideas, and intervening in situations where conversations become too heated will ensure that a negative feeling is not associated with these meetings.

      Finally, we also saw that physical conditions can influence how effective communication is. If you are able, try to schedule meetings in a comfortable place and monitor the overall temperature and other controllable physical conditions in the room where the meeting is taking place.

      1 Gordon, T. (2003). Teacher Effectiveness Training. First Revised Edition. New York: Three Rivers Press.

      2 Ioannidou, F. and Konstantikaki, V. (2008). Empathy and emotional intelligence: what is it really about? International Journal of Caring Sciences 1 (3): 118–123.

      3 Mikoluk K (2014) Principles of Communication: 7 Pillars of Business Communication. Udemy https://blog.udemy.com/principles-of-communication/.

      4 Pfeiffer JW (1998) Conditions that Hinder Effective Communication.

      5 Salovey, P. and Mayer, J. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 9 (3): 185–211.

      6 Waugh, J. (2014). Real Dialogue Require Tolerance: Hostility Is the Antithesis of Effective Communication. The Daily of the University of Washington.

       R. Shane Tubbs

       Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA

      Charisma comes from the Greek word χimages ρισμα meaning gift or divine favor, implying it is handed out by the gods. Wiseman has said, “Charisma is hard to pin down; we all have a sense of someone having it, but it is difficult to explain why” (Highfield 2005). In this regard, there are multiple and conflicting viewpoints on how to specifically define this term. Some have considered charisma as a behavior and others as a trait (Owen 2014). Antonakis et al. (2012) have defined charisma as “the ability to communicate a clear, visionary, and inspirational message that captivates and motivates an audience.” Kendall et al. (2000) defined charismatic authority as the “power legitimized on the basis of a leader's exceptional personal qualities or the demonstration of extraordinary insight and accomplishment, which inspire loyalty and obedience from followers.” Weber defined charisma as “a certain quality of an individual's personality by virtue of which he/she is considered extraordinary and treated as endowed with supernatural, superhuman, or at least specifically exceptional powers or qualities” (Owen 2014). Wiseman believes charisma has deep evolutionary roots and that a person's impact on someone else's emotions can result in the affected person attributing charisma to the person (Highfield 2005).

      Werrell (2013) stated that charisma is the rare quality that makes people like you, even when they don't