<--- Score
126. Is there any additional Network transparency definition of success?
<--- Score
127. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
128. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
129. How does the Network transparency manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
130. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
131. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
132. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
133. Is there a clear Network transparency case definition?
<--- Score
134. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
135. How do you manage changes in Network transparency requirements?
<--- Score
136. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Network transparency Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
2. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
3. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
4. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
5. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
6. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
7. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
8. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
9. Do you have any cost Network transparency limitation requirements?
<--- Score
10. Are there measurements based on task performance?
<--- Score
11. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
12. Are the Network transparency benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
13. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
14. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
15. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
16. How do you verify the Network transparency requirements quality?
<--- Score
17. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
18. Are Network transparency vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
19. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
20. How can you measure Network transparency in a systematic way?
<--- Score
21. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
22. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
23. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
24. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
25. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
26. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
27. Which Network transparency impacts are significant?
<--- Score
28. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
29. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
30. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
31. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
32. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
33. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
34. Are indirect costs charged to the Network transparency program?
<--- Score
35. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
36. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
37. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
38. What are the costs and benefits?
<--- Score
39. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
40. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
41. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
42. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
43. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
44. Who should receive measurement reports?
<---