<--- Score
112. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
113. What are the core elements of the Architecture design software business case?
<--- Score
114. What Architecture design software requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
115. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Architecture design software goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
116. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
117. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
118. How does the Architecture design software manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
119. How do you think the partners involved in Architecture design software would have defined success?
<--- Score
120. Is the Architecture design software scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
121. When is/was the Architecture design software start date?
<--- Score
122. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
123. How are consistent Architecture design software definitions important?
<--- Score
124. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
125. How will the Architecture design software team and the group measure complete success of Architecture design software?
<--- Score
126. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
127. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
128. Is there a critical path to deliver Architecture design software results?
<--- Score
129. Have all basic functions of Architecture design software been defined?
<--- Score
130. Do you have a Architecture design software success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
131. How did the Architecture design software manager receive input to the development of a Architecture design software improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
132. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
133. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
134. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Architecture design software changes?
<--- Score
135. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
136. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Architecture design software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
2. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
3. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
4. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
5. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
6. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
7. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
8. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
9. Does the Architecture design software task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
10. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
11. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
12. Are missed Architecture design software opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
13. How is the value delivered by Architecture design software being measured?
<--- Score
14. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
15. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
16. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
17. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
18. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
19. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
20. How frequently do you track Architecture design software measures?
<--- Score
21. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
22. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
23. How do you measure efficient delivery of Architecture design software services?
<--- Score
24. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
25. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score