<--- Score
128. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
129. Is there a critical path to deliver Medical telemetry results?
<--- Score
130. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
131. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
132. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
133. How did the Medical telemetry manager receive input to the development of a Medical telemetry improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Medical telemetry Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
2. Have you included everything in your Medical telemetry cost models?
<--- Score
3. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
4. What are the current costs of the Medical telemetry process?
<--- Score
5. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
6. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
7. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
8. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
9. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
10. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
11. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
12. How do you measure efficient delivery of Medical telemetry services?
<--- Score
13. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
14. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
15. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?
<--- Score
16. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
17. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
18. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
19. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
20. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
21. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
22. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
23. What is the cause of any Medical telemetry gaps?
<--- Score
24. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
25. How sensitive must the Medical telemetry strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
26. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
27. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
28. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
29. What are the costs?
<--- Score
30. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
31. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
32. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
33. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
34. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
35. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
36. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
37. How can a Medical telemetry test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
38. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
39. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
40. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
41. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
42. Is the cost worth the Medical telemetry effort ?
<--- Score
43. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
44. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
45. How do you verify and validate the Medical telemetry data?
<--- Score
46. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
47. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Medical telemetry? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?