130. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Games as service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Have you included everything in your Games as service cost models?
<--- Score
2. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
3. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
4. How do you verify Games as service completeness and accuracy?
<--- Score
5. How frequently do you verify your Games as service strategy?
<--- Score
6. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
7. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
8. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
9. Among the Games as service product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
10. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
11. What are the Games as service investment costs?
<--- Score
12. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
13. Does the Games as service task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
14. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
15. Are Games as service vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
16. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
17. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
18. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
19. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
20. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
21. What is the Games as service business impact?
<--- Score
22. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
23. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
24. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
25. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
26. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
27. Are the Games as service benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
28. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
29. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
30. What potential environmental factors impact the Games as service effort?
<--- Score
31. How do you verify the Games as service requirements quality?
<--- Score
32. Is the cost worth the Games as service effort ?
<--- Score
33. Will Games as service have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
34. What are the Games as service key cost drivers?
<--- Score
35. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
36. How can a Games as service test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
37. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
38. How frequently do you track Games as service measures?
<--- Score
39. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
40. What are the costs?
<--- Score
41. Are there competing Games as service priorities?
<--- Score
42. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
43. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
44. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
45. How do you verify and validate the Games as service data?
<--- Score
46. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
47. What are the costs of delaying Games as service action?
<--- Score
48. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
49. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
50. What are you verifying?
<--- Score
51. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
52. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
53. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
54. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?