<--- Score
16. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
17. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
18. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
19. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
20. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
21. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
22. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
23. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
24. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
25. What is in scope?
<--- Score
26. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
27. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
28. What is the scope of Games as service?
<--- Score
29. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
30. How does the Games as service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
31. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
32. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
33. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
34. Is there any additional Games as service definition of success?
<--- Score
35. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
36. Is the Games as service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
37. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
38. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
39. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
40. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
41. Are the Games as service requirements complete?
<--- Score
42. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
43. How did the Games as service manager receive input to the development of a Games as service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
44. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
45. Will a Games as service production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
46. Is the Games as service scope manageable?
<--- Score
47. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
48. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
49. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
50. When is/was the Games as service start date?
<--- Score
51. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
52. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
53. Is there a clear Games as service case definition?
<--- Score
54. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Games as service?
<--- Score
55. What is the context?
<--- Score
56. What are the record-keeping requirements of Games as service activities?
<--- Score
57. Who approved the Games as service scope?
<--- Score
58. Who is gathering Games as service information?
<--- Score
59. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
60. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
61. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
62. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Games as service? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
63. Is Games as service required?
<--- Score
64. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
65. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
66. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
67. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
68. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
69. How do you think the partners involved in Games as service would have defined success?
<--- Score
70. What was the context?
<--- Score
71. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
72. How have you