Antenna and EM Modeling with MATLAB Antenna Toolbox. Sergey N. Makarov. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Sergey N. Makarov
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Техническая литература
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119693703
Скачать книгу
a somewhat narrower microstrip as compared to the 50 Ω microstrip line.

      Emphasize that the quarter wave transformer is relatively narrowband; it cannot be used for antenna matching over a wide band. Also, some reflections and standing waves will occur along the quarter wave line.

      It follows from the previous discussion that the major dimensionless parameter that characterizes antenna matching is the antenna reflection coefficient, Γ. To highlight the physical meaning of the reflection coefficient and its acceptable threshold, we rewrite Eq. (1.17) for the antenna power one more time:

      (1.31)equation

      will attain the value of −10 dB. Since ideal antenna matching (|Γ|=0 or |Γ|dB = − ∞) is never possible over the entire frequency band, it is a common agreement that, if

      The TX antenna may be treated as a one port (port 1) of an electric linear network, whereas the other ports (if present) are other antennas. An example is given by a transmit/receive antenna pair, which form a two‐port linear network. In that and similar cases,

      (1.33)equation

      where S11 is the port 1 complex reflection coefficient or the first diagonal term of a multi‐port scattering matrix images [1]. Similarly, Eq. (1.32) may be written in the form:

      Note:

      Along with the reflection coefficient in dB, |S11|dB is always nonpositive. The terminal condition |S11|dB = 0 dB corresponds to a complete reflection of the voltage generator signal from the antenna. Nothing is being radiated.

      Note:

      Meanings of the complex reflection coefficient Γ itself and the dB measure of its magnitude, 20log10|Γ|, are often interchanged. For example, if an antenna datasheet reports “antenna reflection coefficient as a function of frequency,” it is 20log10|Γ| that is being plotted (cf. Figure 1.8 as an example).

      Using MATLAB Antenna Toolbox, determine antenna impedance bandwidth for the blade dipole antenna with lA = 15 cm, w = 8 mm.

      Solution: The approximate resonant frequency of the half wave dipole with the length of 15 cm is about 1 GHz. We again choose the frequency band from 200 to 1200 MHz for testing. A simple MATLAB script given below initializes the dipole antenna, plots the antenna geometry, and computes the dipole reflection coefficient Γ = S11. Note that the computations are performed exactly following Eq. (1.17), i.e. without an extra cable. Figure 1.8 shows the resulting dipole geometry and the reflection coefficient comparison with the analytical result obtained from Eq. (1.14). The agreement between two solutions is good while the numerical solution is again expected to be somewhat more accurate for this particular geometry. Note that the exact reflection coefficient values below −10 dB do not really matter, they are very sensitive to small variations of the antenna impedance around 50 Ω and are subject to noise.

      %% Setup analysis parameters f = linspace(200e6, 1200e6, 1000); % Frequency, Hz lA = 0.15; % Dipole total length, m a = 0.002; % Dipole radius, m %% Antenna toolbox model and analysis w = cylinder2strip(a); % Eq. strip width model d = dipole('Length',lA,'Width',w); % Strip dipole model figure; show(d) % Visualize geometry S11 = rfparam(sparameters(d,f,Rg),1,1); % Calculate s-parameters S11dB = 20*log10(abs(S11));

Schematic illustration of magnitude of the reflection coefficient in dB for the dipole antenna and the antenna impedance bandwidth. Numerical solution is shown by a dashed curve.

      (1.35)equation

      The antenna impedance bandwidth BW (or fractional bandwidth) is determined in the form

      which is a very typical value for a wire dipole or a thin‐blade