Antenna and EM Modeling with MATLAB Antenna Toolbox. Sergey N. Makarov. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Sergey N. Makarov
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Техническая литература
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119693703
Скачать книгу
the last 70 or so years, a lot of efforts have been made to develop a good analytical terminal dipole model. As a result, one can use the following proven semi‐analytical expression for the input dipole impedance [2]:

Schematic illustration of dipole antenna for the evaluation of the reflection coefficient.

      If a strip or blade dipole of width t is considered, then aeq = t/4 [3] (providing the same equivalent capacitance of a dipole wing per unit length). We note here that a is the radius of a cylindrical dipole, while aeq is the equivalent radius of a wire approximation to the strip dipole. Eq. (1.14) holds for relatively short nonresonant dipoles and for half‐wave dipoles, i.e. in the frequency domain approximately given by

      (1.15)equation

      where fresc0/(2lA) is the resonant frequency of an idealized dipole having exactly a half‐wave resonance (c0 is again the speed of light) and fC is the center frequency of the band. This means that the ideal dipole resonates when its length is the half wavelength. When a monopole over an infinite ground plane is studied, the impedance in Eq. (1.14) halves.

      Plot to scale the input impedance for a dipole antenna with lA = 15 cm, a = 2 mm and over the band 200–1200 MHz using Eq. (1.14) and MATLAB.

      f = linspace(200e6, 1200e6, 1000);% Frequency, Hz lA = 0.15; % Dipole total length, m a = 0.002; % Dipole radius, m Za = dipoleAnalytical(f, lA, a); % Find resonant frequency Ra = real(Za); Xa = imag(Za); % Find resistance and reactance [dummy, index] = min(abs(Xa)); % Find resonant frequency fresMHz = f(index)/1e6 hold on; grid on; plot(f/1e6, Ra, 'b', 'LineWidth', 2); plot(f/1e6, Xa, 'r', 'LineWidth', 2); xlabel ('frequency, MHz'); ylabel ('Impedance, \Omega'); axis([min(f)/1e6 max(f)/1e6 -200 200]); title('Dipole resistance(blue) and reactance(red), \Omega'); line([fresMHz fresMHz],[-200 200]);Schematic illustration of dipole antenna impedance in the vicinity of its first (series) resonance. The dashed line shows the resonant frequency.

      The MATLAB script above uses function dipoleAnalytical that corresponds to Eq. (1.14):

      function [Za] = dipoleAnalytical(f, lA, a); % EM data epsilon = 8.85418782e-012; % Vacuum, F/m mu = 1.25663706e-006; % Vacuum, H/m c = 1/sqrt(epsilon*mu); % Vacuum, m/s eta = sqrt(mu/epsilon); % Vacuum, Ohm l = lA/2; % Dipole half length k = 2*pi*f/c; % Wavenumber z = k*l; % Electrical length corresponding to l R = -0.4787 + 7.3246*z + 0.3963*z.^2 + 15.6131*z.^3; X = -0.4456 + 17.0082*z - 8.6793*z.^2 + 9.6031*z.^3; Za = R - j*( 120*(log(l/a)-1)*cot(z)-X ); % Antenna impedance end

      Note:

      We will show later in the text that all metal antennas could be scaled in size so that a dipole with the size twice as small as the original one has the resonant frequency that is two times larger than the original resonant frequency. Similarly, a dipole with the size twice as large as the original one has the resonant frequency that is two times less. In other words, small antennas have high resonant frequencies and vice versa.

      The scaling property of the antenna implies measuring its length lA in terms of a dimensionless quantity called electrical length. The electrical length is simply the product of lA and the wavenumber k = 2π/λ. The electrical length of the antenna does not depend on its operation frequency. A dipole antenna resonating at 100 MHz or at 5 GHz has the same electrical length.

      The dipole antenna discussed thus far is a classic example of a narrow‐band antenna that has its first resonance as a series resonance. In general, a resonance is characterized by a zero reactance, Xa = 0. However, the resistance value can vary dramatically depending on the type of resonance, i.e. series or parallel. Parallel resonances typically achieve large resistances. In the case of the dipole, the series resonances occur at odd multiples of fres. In general, the dipole is not used at higher multiples of the fundamental resonance. The half‐wavelength current distribution is no longer valid at these frequencies and therefore the radiation pattern of the antenna is also distorted.

      Although impedances of many basic antenna types and geometries (dipoles, loops, patch antennas) are well documented (in particular, in Antenna Engineering Handbook, John L. Volakis, Ed., McGraw Hill, 2018, fifth edition), any particular antenna design heavily relies upon numerical electromagnetic modeling.

      Let us compare the theoretical model for the dipole antenna impedance with a numerical model. The theoretical model is based on a cylindrical dipole (1.14). The modeling software used in this text is the Method of Moments software of the MATLAB® Antenna Toolbox. This software has a library of antenna models that are parameterized to enable easy geometry setup and analysis. One such model is the dipole.