Antenna and EM Modeling with MATLAB Antenna Toolbox. Sergey N. Makarov. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Sergey N. Makarov
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Техническая литература
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119693703
Скачать книгу
of the power delivered to the antenna."/>

      according to the familiar one‐dimensional plane wave theory. Here, k is the real wavenumber of the lossless transmission line. It is equal to the angular frequency divided by the phase velocity (propagation speed), c, of the line. Voltage wave V+ propagates from left to right and corresponds to cos(ωtkz) in time domain while voltage wave V propagates from right to left and corresponds to cos(ωt + kz). Note that k = β in Pozar's book [1].

      Show that the addition of a lossless transmission line of any length, which is still perfectly matched at the generator, does not change average power delivered to the antenna of any input impedance. Only a phase of the reflection coefficient at the generator changes.

      Solution: The solution is based on Eq. (1.24), which yields

      (1.25)equation

      Therefore, according to Eq. (1.17),

      (1.26)equation

      This example is perhaps overly optimistic. It needs two notes of caution.

      First, if the transmission line is lossy, the factor |exp(−2jkl)| is becoming less than one (k is becoming complex) and the reflection coefficient decreases. An antenna connected by a very long lossy cable will be perfectly matched to the generator since |Γ*| → 0, but its radiated power will simply be zero. For example, a popular RG‐58 50‐Ω cable with the length of 10 m will accept 100 W from the generator but deliver only 33 W of power to the antenna. It is not a good practice to “match” the antennae by adding long lossy transmission lines.

      Second, while one mismatch at the antenna still keeps the delivered power and |Γ| unchanged, two or more arbitrary mismatches (the second mismatch is often at the generator) due to non‐perfect cables, connectors, etc., may (or, sometimes, may not) lead to the “ripples” or visible oscillations of the measured |Γ| as often seen on the network analyzer. This is because the factor exp(−2jkl) will appear not only multiplicatively, but also additively.

      Here, we use the well‐known result for the antenna impedance transformation along a lossless transmission line of length l. In the plane labeled (*) in Figure 1.7b, the transformed antenna impedance (the equivalent impedance of the antenna with the transmission line) becomes [1]

      This result is obtained from impedance definition and by relating voltages and currents on the line via its characteristic impedance, Z0.

      We have shown in the previous section that adding the lossless transmission line perfectly matched at the generator does not change antenna power. Now, we are about to show that adding a transmission line mismatched at both ends does change antenna power. It may be quite beneficial for impedance matching.

      Example 1.9

      An antenna with Za = 200 Ω is to be perfectly matched to the generator with Rg = 50 Ω by a proper choice of line characteristic impedance Z0.

      (1.29)equation

      It is not difficult to construct such a transmission