Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: Ingram
Серия: Evaluation in Practice Series
Жанр произведения: Социология
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781544344621
Скачать книгу

       Cousins, J. B., Whitmore, E., & Shulha, L. M. (2013). Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(1), 7–22.

       Cousins, J. B., Whitmore, E., & Shulha, L. M. (2014). Let there be light: Response to Fetterman et al., 2014. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1), 149–153.

       Dahler-Larsen, P. (2009). Learning-oriented educational evaluation in contemporary society. In K. E. Ryan & J. B. Cousins (Eds.), Sage international handbook for educational evaluation (pp. 307–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

       Daigneault, P.-M., & Jacob, S. (2009). Toward accurate measurement of participation rethinking the conceptualization and operationalization of participatory evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 330–348.

       Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The ‘most significant change’ (MSC) Technique: A guide to its use. Cambridge, UK: Authors. Retrieved from http://www.mande.co.uk/docs/MSCGuide.pdf

       Fals-Borda, O., & Anisur-Rahman, M. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York, NY: Apex Press.

       Fetterman, D. (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15, 1–15.

       Fetterman, D., Rodriguez-Campos, L., Zukoski, A. P., & Contributors (Eds.). (2018). Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation: Stakeholder involvement approaches. New York, NY: Guilford.

       Fetterman, D., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

       Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury Press.

       Gilbert, N. (2018). Understanding the process of patient engagement in planning and evaluation of health services: A case study of the Psychosocial Oncology Program at the Ottawa Hospital (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

       Gilbert, N., & Cousins, J. B. (2017). Advancing patient engagement in health service improvement: What can the evaluation community offer? Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32(2), 1–20.

       Harnar, M. A. (2012). Theory building through praxis discourse: A theory- and practice-informed model of transformative participatory evaluation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA.

       Hay, K. (2010). Evaluation field building in South Asia: Reflections, anecdotes, and questions. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 222–231.

       Hoare, T., Levy, C., & Robinson, M. P. (1993). Participatory action research in Native communities: Cultural opportunities and legal implications. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 13(1), 43–68.

       Hood, S., Hopson, R., & Kirkhart, K. (2015). Culturally responsive evaluation: Theory, practice and future implications. In K. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, & J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (4th ed.). (pp. 281–317). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

       King, J. A. (2005). Participatory evaluation. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of evaluation (pp. 291–294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

       LaFrance, J., & Nichols, R. (2008). Reframing evaluation: Defining an indigenous evaluation framework. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23(2), 13–31.

       Mark, M. M. (2009). Evaluation, method choices and pathways to consequences: Trying to make sense of how evaluation can contribute to sensemaking. In K. E. Ryan & J. B. Cousins (Eds.), Sage international handbook on educational evaluation (pp. 55–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

       Mark, M. M., & Shotland, R. L. (1985). Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgments. Evaluation Review, 9, 605–626.

       Mayne, J. (2001). Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16, 1–21.

       Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270–280.

       Mertens, D. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford.

       Miller, R. L., & Campbell, R. (2006). Taking stock of empowerment evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(3), 296–319.

       Milley, P., Szijarto, B., Svensson, K., & Cousins, J. B. (2018). The Evaluation of social innovation: A review and integration of the current empirical knowledge base. Evaluation, 24(2), 237–258.

       O’Sullivan, R. G. (2004). Practicing evaluation: A collaborative approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

       O’Sullivan, R. G. (2012). Collaborative Evaluation within a framework of stakeholder-oriented evaluation approaches. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35, 518–522.

       Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

       Patton, M. Q. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 311–320.

       Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: A new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

       Patton, M. Q. (2005). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context: Take two. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 408–414.

       Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

       Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford.

       Patton, M. Q. (2017). Principles-focused evaluation: The GUIDE. New York, NY: Guilford.

       Preskill, H. (2008). Evaluation’s second act: Spotlight on Learning. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(2), 127–138.

       Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (2000). A learning dimension of evaluation use. In V. Carcelli & H. Preskill (Eds.), The expanding scope of evaluation use. New directions in evaluation, no 88 (pp. 25–37). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

       Rodriguez-Campos, L. (2005). Collaborative evaluation: A step by step model for the evaluator. Tamerac, FL: Llumina Press.

       Rodriguez-Campos, L. (Ed.). (2015). Collaborative evaluation in practice: Insights from business, nonprofit, and education. Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age.

       Rugh, J., Steinke, M., Cousins, J. B., & Bamberger, M. (2009). Summary of discussion of the ‘Alternative to the Statistical Counterfactual Think Tank,’ presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2010.

       Ryan, K. E., & DeStefano, L. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation as a democratic process: Promoting inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation, no. 85 (pp. 27–38). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

       Serrat, O. (2009, January). The most significant change technique. Knowledge Solutions, 25, 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/knowledgesolutions

       Shulha, L. M. (2000). Evaluative inquiry in university-school professional learning partnerships. In H. Preskill & V. Caracelli (Eds.), The learning dimension of evaluation use, new directions for evaluation (Vol. 88, pp. 39–53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

       Shulha, L. M., & Cousins, J. B. (1997). Evaluation use: Theory, research and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18, 195–208.

       Shulha, L. M., Whitmore, E., Cousins, J. B., Gilbert, N., & AlHudib, H. (2016). Introducing evidence-based principles to guide collaborative approaches to evaluation: Results of an empirical process. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(2), 193–215.

       Shulha, L. M., & Wilson, R. J. (1995). Inviting collaboration: Insights into researcher-school community partnership. In J. B. Cousins & L. Earl (Eds.), Participatory evaluation in education: Studies in evaluation use and organizational learning. Bristol, England: Falmer Press.