<--- Score
76. What happens if Information loss’s scope changes?
<--- Score
77. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
78. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
79. Have all basic functions of Information loss been defined?
<--- Score
80. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
81. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
82. What would be the goal or target for a Information loss’s improvement team?
<--- Score
83. What is the context?
<--- Score
84. What is the scope of Information loss?
<--- Score
85. Who is gathering Information loss information?
<--- Score
86. What is the scope?
<--- Score
87. What gets examined?
<--- Score
88. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
89. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
90. Has the Information loss work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
91. Is there a Information loss management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
92. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
93. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information loss work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
94. How do you manage unclear Information loss requirements?
<--- Score
95. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
96. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
97. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
98. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
99. How do you hand over Information loss context?
<--- Score
100. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
101. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
102. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
103. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
104. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information loss?
<--- Score
105. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Information loss improvements?
<--- Score
106. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
107. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
108. Who approved the Information loss scope?
<--- Score
109. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
110. Is there a critical path to deliver Information loss results?
<--- Score
111. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
112. Is the scope of Information loss defined?
<--- Score
113. Why are you doing Information loss and what is the scope?
<--- Score
114. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
116. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
117. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
118. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
119. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information loss activities?
<--- Score
120. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
121. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
122. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
123. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
124. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
125. Do you have a Information loss success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
126. What is in scope?
<--- Score
127. How do you think the partners involved in Information loss would have defined success?
<--- Score
128. What is the scope of the Information loss effort?
<--- Score
129. What are the Information loss use cases?
<--- Score
130. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
131. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified