<--- Score
68. Is there a Emergency planning management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
69. How does the Emergency planning manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
70. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
71. What system do you use for gathering Emergency planning information?
<--- Score
72. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
73. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
74. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Emergency planning? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
75. What is the scope of Emergency planning?
<--- Score
76. How are consistent Emergency planning definitions important?
<--- Score
77. Will team members perform Emergency planning work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
78. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
79. How have you defined all Emergency planning requirements first?
<--- Score
80. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
81. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
82. Will team members regularly document their Emergency planning work?
<--- Score
83. What are (control) requirements for Emergency planning Information?
<--- Score
84. What is the scope of the Emergency planning work?
<--- Score
85. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
86. Do you all define Emergency planning in the same way?
<--- Score
87. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
88. How can the value of Emergency planning be defined?
<--- Score
89. What are the record-keeping requirements of Emergency planning activities?
<--- Score
90. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
91. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Emergency planning brings?
<--- Score
92. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
93. Is Emergency planning currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
94. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
95. How do you manage changes in Emergency planning requirements?
<--- Score
96. What Emergency planning requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
97. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
98. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
99. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
100. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
101. How would you define Emergency planning leadership?
<--- Score
102. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
103. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
104. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
105. What sources do you use to gather information for a Emergency planning study?
<--- Score
106. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
107. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
108. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
109. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
110. How will the Emergency planning team and the group measure complete success of Emergency planning?
<--- Score
111. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
112. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
113. Do you have a Emergency planning success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
114. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
115. When is/was the Emergency planning start date?
<--- Score
116. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
117. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
118. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Emergency planning?
<--- Score
119. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
120. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
121. What was the context?
<--- Score
122. Is there a critical path to deliver Emergency planning results?
<---