<--- Score
130. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
131. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
132. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
133. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
134. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Source coding brings?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Source coding Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
2. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
3. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
4. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
5. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
6. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
7. What are the Source coding investment costs?
<--- Score
8. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
9. How do you measure lifecycle phases?
<--- Score
10. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
11. Do you have an issue in getting priority?
<--- Score
12. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
13. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
14. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
15. What is your Source coding quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
16. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
17. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
18. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
19. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
20. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
21. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
22. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
23. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
24. How can you measure Source coding in a systematic way?
<--- Score
25. What is the total cost related to deploying Source coding, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
26. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
27. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
28. Are missed Source coding opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
29. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
30. What can be used to verify compliance?
<--- Score
31. Among the Source coding product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
32. How can a Source coding test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
33. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?
<--- Score
34. How frequently do you track Source coding measures?
<--- Score
35. What are the current costs of the Source coding process?
<--- Score
36. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
37. How do you verify and validate the Source coding data?
<--- Score
38. What details are required of the Source coding cost structure?
<--- Score
39. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
40. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
41. At what cost?
<--- Score
42. Does a Source coding quantification method exist?
<--- Score
43. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
44. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
45. Why a Source coding focus?
<--- Score
46. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
47. How do you measure efficient delivery of Source coding services?
<--- Score
48. Are the Source coding benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
49. Are Source coding vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
50.