120. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
121. How do you hand over Resource economics context?
<--- Score
122. Is Resource economics linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
123. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
124. Is there a Resource economics management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
125. Are improvement team members fully trained on Resource economics?
<--- Score
126. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
127. How do you manage changes in Resource economics requirements?
<--- Score
128. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
129. What is the context?
<--- Score
130. Is Resource economics required?
<--- Score
131. How does the Resource economics manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
132. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
133. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
134. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
135. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
136. How can the value of Resource economics be defined?
<--- Score
137. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Resource economics Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
2. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
3. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
4. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
5. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
6. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
7. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
8. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
9. Are missed Resource economics opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
10. What could cause you to change course?
<--- Score
11. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
12. How do you measure efficient delivery of Resource economics services?
<--- Score
13. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
14. What are the operational costs after Resource economics deployment?
<--- Score
15. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
16. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
17. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
18. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?
<--- Score
19. Are there competing Resource economics priorities?
<--- Score
20. Are Resource economics vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
21. What is the total cost related to deploying Resource economics, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
22. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Resource economics services/products?
<--- Score
23. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
24. What are the Resource economics investment costs?
<--- Score
25. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
26. What would it cost to replace your technology?
<--- Score
27. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
28. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
29. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
30. Where is it measured?
<--- Score
31. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
32. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
33. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?
<--- Score
34. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
35. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<---