70. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
71. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
72. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
73. How do you catch System of reference definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
74. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
75. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
76. Are accountability and ownership for System of reference clearly defined?
<--- Score
77. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
78. When is/was the System of reference start date?
<--- Score
79. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
80. What are the core elements of the System of reference business case?
<--- Score
81. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
82. Is there a critical path to deliver System of reference results?
<--- Score
83. Is System of reference required?
<--- Score
84. How do you hand over System of reference context?
<--- Score
85. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
86. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
87. How are consistent System of reference definitions important?
<--- Score
88. What System of reference services do you require?
<--- Score
89. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
90. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
91. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
92. How do you gather System of reference requirements?
<--- Score
93. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
94. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
95. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
96. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
97. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
98. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
99. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
100. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that System of reference brings?
<--- Score
101. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
102. What sources do you use to gather information for a System of reference study?
<--- Score
103. Is System of reference linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
104. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
105. Who is gathering System of reference information?
<--- Score
106. Will a System of reference production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
107. Have all basic functions of System of reference been defined?
<--- Score
108. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to System of reference changes?
<--- Score
109. What is the scope of the System of reference effort?
<--- Score
110. Who approved the System of reference scope?
<--- Score
111. Is there any additional System of reference definition of success?
<--- Score
112. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform System of reference work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
113. Are the System of reference requirements testable?
<--- Score
114. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
115. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
116. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
117. Has the System of reference work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
118. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
119. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
120. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
121. Is there a clear System of reference case definition?
<--- Score
122. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
123. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does System of reference leverage and how?
<--- Score
124. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
125. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
126.