<--- Score
63. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
64. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
65. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
66. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
67. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
68. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
69. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
70. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
71. Is Intelligence cycle management currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
72. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
73. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
74. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Intelligence cycle management leverage and how?
<--- Score
75. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
76. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
77. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
78. What are the Intelligence cycle management use cases?
<--- Score
79. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
80. How do you gather Intelligence cycle management requirements?
<--- Score
81. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Intelligence cycle management changes?
<--- Score
82. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
83. What was the context?
<--- Score
84. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
85. How are consistent Intelligence cycle management definitions important?
<--- Score
86. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
87. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
88. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
89. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
90. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
91. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
92. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
93. Will team members regularly document their Intelligence cycle management work?
<--- Score
94. What is the scope of the Intelligence cycle management work?
<--- Score
95. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
96. Is there a clear Intelligence cycle management case definition?
<--- Score
97. How will the Intelligence cycle management team and the group measure complete success of Intelligence cycle management?
<--- Score
98. How does the Intelligence cycle management manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
99. Are the Intelligence cycle management requirements testable?
<--- Score
100. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Intelligence cycle management?
<--- Score
101. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
102. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
103. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Intelligence cycle management? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
104. Is Intelligence cycle management required?
<--- Score
105. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
106. What would be the goal or target for a Intelligence cycle management’s improvement team?
<--- Score
107. Is the Intelligence cycle management scope manageable?
<--- Score
108. What Intelligence cycle management services do you require?
<--- Score
109. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Intelligence cycle management work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
110. Who are the Intelligence cycle management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
111. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
112. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
113. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
114. What happens if Intelligence cycle management’s scope changes?
<--- Score
115. Are accountability and ownership for Intelligence cycle management clearly defined?
<--- Score
116. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
117.