<--- Score
114. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
115. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
116. What do people want to verify?
<--- Score
117. How will your organization measure success?
<--- Score
118. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
119. How frequently do you track Google applications measures?
<--- Score
120. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
121. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?
<--- Score
122. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
123. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
124. What tests verify requirements?
<--- Score
125. What evidence is there and what is measured?
<--- Score
126. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
127. What are the Google applications investment costs?
<--- Score
128. Are Google applications vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
129. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
130. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
131. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
132. Does a Google applications quantification method exist?
<--- Score
133. What are the costs of reform?
<--- Score
134. Does the Google applications task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
135. Are there competing Google applications priorities?
<--- Score
136. How do your measurements capture actionable Google applications information for use in exceeding your customers expectations and securing your customers engagement?
<--- Score
137. Are indirect costs charged to the Google applications program?
<--- Score
138. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
139. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Google applications? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
140. What is the Google applications business impact?
<--- Score
141. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Google applications Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:
INTENT: Analyze causes, assumptions and hypotheses.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Do staff qualifications match your project?
<--- Score
2. Who is involved with workflow mapping?
<--- Score
3. Identify an operational issue in your organization, for example, could a particular task be done more quickly or more efficiently by Google applications?
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.