<--- Score
59. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
60. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
61. Is it needed?
<--- Score
62. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
63. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
64. Have you identified your Google applications key performance indicators?
<--- Score
65. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Google applications as an effective investment?
<--- Score
66. What does Google applications success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
67. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
68. Do you recognize Google applications achievements?
<--- Score
69. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
70. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
71. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
72. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
73. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
74. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Google applications research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
75. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
76. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
77. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
78. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
79. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
80. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
81. Why the need?
<--- Score
82. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
83. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
84. How do you recognize an Google applications objection?
<--- Score
85. What information do users need?
<--- Score
86. What are the expected benefits of Google applications to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
87. Are there Google applications problems defined?
<--- Score
88. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
89. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Google applications will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
90. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
91. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Google applications? In other words, what are the risks, if Google applications does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
92. When a Google applications manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
93. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
94. How are the Google applications’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
95. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
96. What Google applications events should you attend?
<--- Score
97. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
98. How do you assess your Google applications workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
99. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Google applications Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you catch Google applications definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
2. How does the Google applications manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
3. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Google applications?
<--- Score
4. Are accountability and ownership for Google applications clearly defined?
<--- Score
5. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
6. What is in scope?
<--- Score
7. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
8. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Google applications goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
9. Are the Google applications requirements testable?