<--- Score
80. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
81. What are the Training Evaluation tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
82. How does the Training Evaluation manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
83. What happens if Training Evaluation’s scope changes?
<--- Score
84. Are the Training Evaluation requirements testable?
<--- Score
85. What Training Evaluation requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
86. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
87. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
88. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
89. How would you define Training Evaluation leadership?
<--- Score
90. Has the Training Evaluation work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
91. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
92. What Training Evaluation services do you require?
<--- Score
93. Will team members regularly document their Training Evaluation work?
<--- Score
94. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
95. What is the scope of the Training Evaluation work?
<--- Score
96. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
97. What are the record-keeping requirements of Training Evaluation activities?
<--- Score
98. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
99. Is the Training Evaluation scope manageable?
<--- Score
100. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
101. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
102. What was the context?
<--- Score
103. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Training Evaluation goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
104. How will the Training Evaluation team and the group measure complete success of Training Evaluation?
<--- Score
105. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
106. What is the scope of the Training Evaluation effort?
<--- Score
107. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Training Evaluation changes?
<--- Score
108. What sources do you use to gather information for a Training Evaluation study?
<--- Score
109. How do you manage unclear Training Evaluation requirements?
<--- Score
110. Is there a Training Evaluation management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
111. How have you defined all Training Evaluation requirements first?
<--- Score
112. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
113. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
114. What are (control) requirements for Training Evaluation Information?
<--- Score
115. Is Training Evaluation required?
<--- Score
116. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
117. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Training Evaluation?
<--- Score
118. Do you all define Training Evaluation in the same way?
<--- Score
119. Is Training Evaluation linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
120. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
121. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
122. Is there a clear Training Evaluation case definition?
<--- Score
123. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Training Evaluation brings?
<--- Score
124. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
125. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
126. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
127. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
128. What is the scope of Training Evaluation?
<--- Score
129. When is/was the Training Evaluation start date?
<--- Score
130. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
131. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
132. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
133. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
134. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
135. What knowledge