Open Management Education A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Зарубежная деловая литература
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781867458326
Скачать книгу
on the Open management education goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      60. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      61. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      62. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      63. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      64. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      65. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      66. Is there a clear Open management education case definition?

      <--- Score

      67. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      68. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      69. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      70. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      71. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      72. Is there a Open management education management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      73. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      74. Are accountability and ownership for Open management education clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      75. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      76. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      77. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      78. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      79. What are the Open management education use cases?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you catch Open management education definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      81. Have all basic functions of Open management education been defined?

      <--- Score

      82. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      83. What is the scope of Open management education?

      <--- Score

      84. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      85. What sources do you use to gather information for a Open management education study?

      <--- Score

      86. Will a Open management education production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      87. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      88. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      89. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      90. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      91. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      92. How can the value of Open management education be defined?

      <--- Score

      93. How do you hand over Open management education context?

      <--- Score

      94. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Open management education brings?

      <--- Score

      95. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      96. What is the definition of Open management education excellence?

      <--- Score

      97. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      98. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      99. Will team members perform Open management education work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      100. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      101. Who are the Open management education improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      102. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      103. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      104. What happens if Open management education’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      105. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      106. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      107. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      108. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      109. Has the Open management education work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      110. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      111. What are the core elements of the Open management education business case?

      <--- Score

      112. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      113. How do you think the partners involved in Open management education would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      114. Is Open management education required?

      <---