Чингисхан. Человек, завоевавший мир. Фрэнк Маклинн. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Фрэнк Маклинн
Издательство: Издательство АСТ
Серия: История в одном томе
Жанр произведения: Биографии и Мемуары
Год издания: 2015
isbn: 978-5-17-116953-4, 978-5-17-095186-4
Скачать книгу
& Hambis, Campagnes pp. 185–187.

      190

      Roux, La mort pp. 92–96.

      191

      SHC pp. 23–24.

      192

      SHC p. 25; SHR pp. 23–24.

      193

      Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan pp. 25–26.

      194

      RT i pp. 93–94; SHC pp. 25–26.

      195

      SHC pp. 27–28; SHO pp. 70–71.

      196

      Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 26.

      197

      SHC p. 29; SHO p. 73.

      198

      SHO pp. 73–74; SHR pp. 26–27.

      199

      SHO p. 75; SHW p. 252.

      200

      SHC pp. 30–31.

      201

      SHO pp. 75–76. For the subsequent career of Bo’orchu, who seems to have died in 1227, roughly the same time as Genghis himself, see Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 342–360.

      202

      Riasanovsky, Fundamental Principles p. 90.

      203

      Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 411–414; Vladimirtsov, Le regime social pp. 58–59.

      204

      RT i pp. 80–89.

      205

      Krader, Social Organization pp. 39, 89 is the source for this. In the kind of language beloved of academic anthropologists he tells us that Temujin’s marriage was an example of matrilateral cross-cousin marriage (ibid, p. 344).

      206

      Rachewiltz, Commentary pp. 391–392.

      207

      RT i p. 93.

      208

      SHO pp. 79–81; SHR pp. 31–32; SHW p. 256.

      209

      Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 34.

      210

      JB i pp. 187–188; Boyle, Successors p. 31.

      211

      SHC pp. 34–38.

      212

      Gumilev, Imaginary Kingdom p. 143. On the other hand, it has been argued strongly that the Merkit raid is not historical but a folkloric trope, a perennial motif in epic poetry about the theft of women, whether of Europa by Zeus, Helen by Paris or the Princess Sita’s seizure in the Hindu epic Ramayana. The raid is one of the prime exhibits in H. Okada, ‘The Secret History of the Mongols, a Pseudo-historical Novel, Journal of Asian and African Studies 5 (1972) pp. 61–67 (at р. 63). But the theory is unconvincing if only because it makes Chagatai’s later violent hostility to Jochi on the grounds of his illegitimacy impossible to fathom.

      213

      Togan, Flexibility p. 73; Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 250, 401.

      214

      Mostaert, Sur quelques passages p. 32.

      215

      Pelliot & Hambis, Campagnes pp. 279–281; Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 421.

      216

      SHC pp. 38–39.

      217

      SHO pp. 91–92; SHR p. 41; Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 428.

      218

      SHC pp. 43–47. As Ratchnevsky tersely comments: ‘Rashid’s version is implausible’ (Genghis Khan p. 35).

      219

      SHC pp. 39–42.

      220

      RT i p. 107.

      221

      RT i pp. 107–108.

      222

      Ratchnevsky, Genghis Khan p. 36.

      223

      SHO pp. 85–87; SHR рр. 35–36.

      224

      SHO pp. 87–90; SHR pp. 37–39; Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 417.

      225

      Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 435.

      226

      SHC pp. 52–53; SHO pp. 95–96; SHR pp. 44–45; SHW p. 262.

      227

      V V Bartold, ‘Chingis-Khan,’ in Encyclopaedia of Islam (1st ed., repr. 1968 v pp. 615–628 (at p. 617)); Vladimirtsov, Le regime social pp. 107–108; Vladimirtsov, Genghis Khan p. 130.

      228

      Grousset, Conqueror of the World p. 67.

      229

      SHO pp. 96–97; SHR pp. 44–46.

      230

      Vladimirtsov, Le regime social pp. 105–107.

      231

      As Rachewiltz sagely remarks, ‘If neither Temujin nor his wife could understand Jamuga’s poetic riddle, what hope have we, who are so far removed from that culture, to understand what was the real meaning of those words?’ (Rachewiltz, Commentary p. 442).

      232

      Owen Lattimore, ‘Chingis Khan and the Mongol Conquests,’ Scientific American 209 (1963) pp. 55–68 (at p. 62); Lattimore, ‘Honor and Loyalty: the case of Temujin and Jamukha,’ in Clark & Draghi, Aspects pp. 127–138 (at p. 133).

      233

      Grousset, Empire pp. 201–202; Gumilev, Imaginary Kingdom pp. 143–145.

      234

      The numbers mentioned in the Secret History are unreliable for a number of reasons: 1) the author embellished with poetic licence and routinely inflated the size of armies; 2) the author anachronistically projected back into the twelfth century names, titles, technologies