Regardless of the popularity of series books among young people during the first half of the twentieth century, librarians en masse rejected the novels as lacking in both style and substance. A particularly vivid expression of this opinion was “Blowing Out the Boy’s Brains” (1914) by Boy Scouts of America librarian Franklin Mathiews. According to Emily Hamilton-Honey (2012), who cites Mathiews as a key Stratemeyer opponent, “Stratemeyer felt that he was producing books that were morally clean, patriotic, and gave good models for behavior. His books were everything that dime novels were not and had never been; he wanted young people to be reading books that were good for them and would not give them evil ideas or bad habits” (p. 772). Hamilton-Honey argues, however, that adult resistance to series novels was more about their connections to youthful autonomy than their quality or morality; she points out that in addition to depicting empowered young people, they also engendered a sense of economic control in child readers who might be able to afford the cheap prices for the books they desired (p. 773). While series books had been popular as well in the nineteenth century, Hamilton-Honey suggests that the new consumerist direction of twentieth-century series constituted a significant departure from the “safe, community-centered space that encouraged obedience and selflessness as well as social activism,” which was depicted in series by Louisa May Alcott, Martha Finley (author of the Elsie Dinsmore series) and Isabella Macdonald Alden (p. 769). If aetonormativity prompted the division of children’s literature from that for adults and justified adults’ protectively restrictive attitude toward mainstream texts of the twentieth century, then series fiction, along with other rising popular forms like the comic book, gave children the opportunity to claim some cultural territory for their own. The lasting personal and scholarly influence of this fiction should serve as a cautionary tale for adults who assume that their judgment necessarily outranks that of younger readers.
While twentieth-century adult gatekeepers rejected series fiction on aesthetic grounds, more recent assessments find strikingly problematic elements in these novels’ depictions of non-white characters. As Tanfer Emin Tunc comments in “Manifest Destiny’s Child: Mary Hazelton Blanchard Wade and the Literature of American Empire” (2017), the creation of the Stratemeyer Syndicate aligned with the inception of Stratemeyer’s “Old Glory” series, which formed part of a robust imperialist trend in children’s literature in the early decades of the twentieth century (p. 249; see also Sands-O’Connor 2014). Later in the century, attempts to address the most overtly racist images only amounted to whitewashing, as in the Nancy Drew series when Adams simply removed the villainized characters rather than integrating positive images of Black, Asian, Indigenous, or Latinx people. As with so much United States history, therefore, the tradition of US children’s series books intersects with racist ideas from the very beginning.
Early Readers
While concerns over series novels indicated adult anxieties about how adolescents might use literature as a conduit to reject the standards and expectations of their elders, literature for the youngest readers – those who need an adult interpreter of written texts or are just beginning to decipher them independently – remained more reassuringly under adult control. The two genres targeting these audiences, picturebooks and early readers, existed well before 1900, but they underwent significant changes during the twentieth century, intersecting in many ways before diverging more definitively after the 1950s. In distinguishing between the two genres, I follow the comparison put forth by Jennifer M. Miskec and Annette Wannamaker (2016): “Early Readers differ from picturebooks, which often feature more sophisticated and poetic language because they are meant to be read aloud by adults to children, and which also differ from Early Readers in shape, size, and production quality because they privilege illustration as an art form” (pp. 4–5). Significant developments in the form of the picturebook have depended on available printing technologies and have been marked by noticeable moments of innovation, such as Wanda Gág’s double-page spreads in her 1928 Millions of Cats (op de Beeck 2011), while the evolution of the early reader has been driven by literacy theories and marked by changes in tone such as Dr. Seuss’s (Theodor Geisel) famous antidote to the orderly world of Dick and Jane with the chaos of The Cat in the Hat (1957). The Cat’s hijinks, along with Else Holmelund Minarik and Maurice Sendak’s Little Bear series, also initiated in 1957, were the first of the long-lasting Beginner Books and I Can Read! series (Caponegro 2016). As the above quote reveals, picturebooks have carried more aesthetic cachet than early readers, which within the field of children’s literature criticism have been laden with the disdain that the early twentieth century directed toward children’s literature in general; Miskec and Wannamaker’s collection was the first to approach the early reader from a literary-critical perspective. In contrast, the picture-book side of the field, which in the United States during the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s included Virginia Lee Burton, Robert McCloskey, and Ludwig Bemelmans, connotes significant aesthetic value: lush illustrations in a wide variety of artistic styles and texts that achieve eloquence and encourage deep thinking, whether the language is spare or detailed. The opportunity for an author/illustrator collaboration in picturebook creation also helps to frame the process as artistically, even personally, enriching, with partnerships such as that of Ruth Krauss and Crockett Johnson or Margaret Wise Brown and Clement Hurd producing some of the most enduring work from the period (Nel 2012). During the 1960s, some texts began to challenge expectations about how children should interact with picturebooks and what kinds of formats or topics were appropriate for young audiences. Maurice Sendak’s Where the Wild Things Are (1963), for example, integrates both carefully spaced text and an acceptance of childhood unruliness, consequently reinventing a conventional journey narrative. However, increased use of many innovations, including metafictional and tactile elements, would wait until the late twentieth century. In sum, with picturebooks as in so many other aspects of the time period I have discussed here, the 1960s seem to set up revolutionary changes that do not fully emerge until the 1970s or later.
REFERENCES
1 Atteber, B. (1980). The Fantasy Tradition in American Literature. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
2 Bishop, R.S. (1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives 1 (3): ix–xi.
3 Bunbury, R.M. (1996). Australia. In: International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature (ed. P. Hunt), 843–854. London: Routledge.
4 Cadogan, M. and Craig, P. (1976). “You’re A Brick, Angela!”: A New Look at Girls’ Fiction from 1839 to 1975. London: Gollancz.
5 Caponegro, R. (2016). From the New England Primer to The Cat in the Hat: Big steps in the growth and development of early readers. In: The Early Reader in Children’s Literature and Culture: Theorizing Books for Beginning Readers (ed. J. Miskec and A. Wannamaker), 13–25. New York: Routledge.
6 Capshaw, K. (2014). Civil Rights Childhood: Picturing Liberation in African American Photobooks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
7 Clark, B.L. (2003). Kiddie Lit: The Cultural Construction of Children’s Literature in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8 Clark, M. (1996). Children’s book publishing in Britain. In: International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature (ed. P. Hunt), 472–477. London: Routledge.
9 D’Amico, L. (ed.) (2016). Girls’ Series Fiction and American Popular Culture. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
10 Donelson, K. (1978). Nancy, Tom, and assorted friends in the Stratemeyer Syndicate then and now. Children’s Literature 7: 17–44.
11 Dyer, C. and Romalov, N.T. (eds.) (1995). Rediscovering Nancy Drew. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
12 Epstein, C.C. (1996). Children’s book publishing in the USA. In: International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature (ed. P. Hunt), 478–484. London: Routledge.
13 Foster, S. and Simons,