Just as fantasy from the earlier portions of the century integrated varying doses of familiarity, many realistic texts depicted fictional worlds that differed significantly from the circumstances of their readers. This was particularly true, as noted in the previous section, for readers who did not fit within the white, heteronormative, middle-class ideal audience imagined by publishers. Like many heroic-ethical and mixed fantasies, realistic fiction during this period tends to be grounded in a distinct sense of place. Elizabeth Enright’s The Saturdays (1941) immerses the four Melendy siblings in the noise and activity of New York City; Maud Hart Lovelace’s Betsy-Tacy series (1940–1955) memorializes small-town life in the Midwestern United States; Noel Streatfeild’s “career novels” such as Ballet Shoes (1936) provide an insider’s perspective of the backstage world in various entertainment fields; and working farms constitute the background of Mary Grant Bruce’s A Little Bush Maid (1910), the first of her Billabong series, and Esther Glen’s Six Little New Zealanders (1917). These texts vividly evoke their distinct physical environments, and some integrate sympathetic storylines involving economic challenges and European immigrants; for example, one of Betsy’s friends must drop out of high school to work after the death of his father in Lovelace’s Betsy Was a Junior (1947), and the plot of Eleanor Estes’s The One Hundred Dresses (1944) revolves around the cruelty of the main characters to a girl of Polish descent. However, these novels tend to leave out or stereotype people of color and members of Indigenous groups who formed a part of the communities they depict. In addition to the unrealistic nature of their identity politics, genres such as the family story and the orphan story often included a range of fantastical elements, from the eerie episodes included in L.M. Montgomery’s Anne of Green Gables (1908–1939) and Emily of New Moon (1923–1927) series to the fictionalizing of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s personal history in Wilder and Rose Wilder Lane’s “Little House” series (1932–1943). As indicated by the titles I have listed here, twentieth-century realistic stories centered around the family provided outlets for female characters, many of whom exercise a level of professional and personal autonomy that some have seen as fantastic; late twentieth- and twenty-first-century critics have debated the extent to which these texts support feminist ideals (Cadogan and Craig 1976; Foster and Simons 1995; Moran 2010).
In addition to enabling the separation of children’s and adult literature as the twentieth century progressed, aetonormativity also encouraged many (though certainly not all) children’s authors to restrict their topics, shying away from issues of cruelty, sexuality, and mortality that came to be defined as “adult.” Hunt (2001) encapsulates the critical consensus that throughout the 1960s, “mainstream (middle-class) children’s books were (broadly) a reflection of the innocence that adults wished to impute to childhood” and that the more explicit novels of the 1970s “were judged against the background of a protective century” (p. 16). During the later decades of the century, then, fantasy and realism converged once again, unraveling the mythical separation of adult and child interests and suggesting that children can influence the adult world while being inextricably enmeshed in it.
Series Books
When Hunt describes pre-1970s mainstream children’s literature as reflecting an image of childhood innocence, he deliberately excludes “popular” texts because they were so much less circumspect. Prominent among the texts voraciously consumed by young readers, yet criticized by adult gatekeepers, were the series books produced in large quantities by stables of ghost writers, the most famous being Edward L. Stratemeyer’s Syndicate. Stratemeyer began his career in the 1890s as a writer of dime novels, but increased his influence on children’s literature exponentially by creating the Syndicate and hiring other writers to create books based on his ideas and skeleton plots (Donelson 1978). The most well-known series produced by the Syndicate are Nancy Drew, The Hardy Boys, The Bobbsey Twins, and Tom Swift, but there were dozens of others as well, with different titles focusing on male and female audiences and featuring adolescents solving mysteries, travelling the world, flying planes, and engaging in other exciting careers. Nancy Drew, as a model of independence, resourcefulness, and intelligence, has resonated particularly effectively with young women, and post-1970 the series has drawn scholarly attention as lively as the multiple reincarnations of Nancy in text and on screen. Carolyn Stewart Dyer and Nancy Tillman Romalov (1995) and Melanie Rehak (2005) are among the scholars who have publicized the roles of Mildred Wirt Benson and Harriet Stratemeyer Adams in creating the “original” Nancy Drew – though originality is an elusive concept when discussing a ghost-written character who has gone through so many revisions. During the 1930s and 4190s, Benson wrote 23 of the first 30 Nancy Drew novels under the pseudonym Carolyn Keene, which would continue to be used for all Nancy Drew titles. However, Adams, who inherited the Syndicate after her father’s death in 1930, rewrote many of Benson’s titles, not only updating the language and removing some of the most racist elements (more on this below), but also completely altering the plot in many cases and revising Nancy’s character to align with a more conservative image of femininity. The rewritten books, with their distinctive gold spines, quickly became the standard edition, and scholars only began to redirect attention to the earlier versions in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The Nancy Drew books also support a status quo based on class hierarchy. As Carolyn Garpan (2009) notes more generally about girls’ series novels, they often “feature wealthy girls who have every material thing a girl could ever want. If the protagonist is from a middle or lower class family, she … proves she is worthy by obeying and protecting the system” (pp. xi–xii). However, there are exceptions to this rule, particularly in the series created outside the ghost-writing system. One example is the Judy Bolton series, written by Margaret Sutton between 1932 and 1967, which tends to challenge rather than confirm existing hierarchies of class as well as gender (Moran 2009; Parry 1997). Perhaps because of the outlets