A Companion to Latin American Literature and Culture. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Языкознание
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119692614
Скачать книгу
Pristine Forest or Cultural Parkland?,” Science 301 (2003): 1710–1714.

      26 Himpele, Jeffrey and Quetzil Castañeda. Incidents of Travel in Chichén Itzá (documentary film). 1997.

      27 Josephy, Alvin M., Jr. The Indian Heritage of America. New York: Bantam Books, 1969.

      28 La Republica. (2018). “Machu Picchu recibió 3.800 turistas diarios en 2017,” March 9, 2018. https://larepublica.pe/economia/1208706-machupicchu-recibio-3-mil-800-turistas-diarios-en-2017.

      29 Latin American Subaltern Studies Group. “Founding Statement,” Disposition 46 (1994): 1–11.

      30 Lentz, David. “Introduction: Definitions and Conceptual Underpinnings,” in Imperfect Balance. Landscape Transformations in the Precolumbian Americas. David Lentz, ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000, 1–11.

      31 Lockhart, James. The Nahuas after the Conquest. A Social and Cultural History of the Indians of Central Mexico, Sixteenth through Eighteenth Centuries. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.

      32 López Mazz, José M. “El fósil que no guía y la formación de los sitios costeros,” in Arqueología en el Uruguay. VIII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Uruguaya. Eds. Mario Consens, José María López Mazz y María del Carmen Curbelo. Montevideo: 1995a, 92–105.

      33 ———. “Aproximación a la génesis y desarrollo de los cerritos de la zona de San Miguel (Departamento de Rocha),” in Ediciones del quinto centenario. Vol. I. Ed. Renzo Pi Hugarte. et al. Montevideo: Universidad de la República, 1992, 76–96.

      34 ———. “Aproximación al territorio de los ‘Constructores De Cerritos’,” in Arqueología en el Uruguay. VIII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología Uruguaya. Eds. Mario Consens, José María López Mazz y María del Carmen Curbelo. Montevideo: 1995b, 65–78.

      35 Lucas, Gavin. The Archaeology of Time. New York: Routledge, 2005.

      36 Lumbreras, Luis G. The Peoples and Cultures of Ancient Peru. Trans. Betty Meggers. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institute Press, 1989.

      37 Malpass, Michael. Provincial Inca: Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Assessment of the Impact of the Inca State. Iowa City: University of Iowa Publishing, 1993.

      38 Mann, Charles C. 1491. New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus. New York: Knopf, 2005.

      39 Milenio Novedades. (2008). “Chichén Itzá y Tulum, de ruinas más visitadas de México. Ocupan segundo y tercer lugares, solo debajo de Teotihuacán.” June 24, 2017. https://sipse.com/milenio/turismo-cifras-2017-zonas-arqueologicas-chichen-itza-258886.html.

      40 Moseley, Michael. The Incas and Their Ancestors. The Archaeology of Peru. Revised edition. London: Thames & Hudson, 2001.

      41 Pauketat, Timothy R. Ancient Cahokia and the Mississippians. London: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

      42 ———. Chiefdoms and Other Archaeological Delusions. Lanham: Altamira Press, 2007.

      43 Pauketat, Timothy R. and Thomas E. Emerson, Eds. Cahokia. Domination and Ideology in the Mississippian World. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000.

      44 Peters, Charles. “Precolumbian Silviculture and Indigenous Management of Neotropical Forests,” in Ed. David Lentz. Imperfect Balance. Landscape Transformations in the Precolumbian Americas. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000, 203–223.

      45 Raffles, Hugh and Antoinette M.G.A. Winkler Prins. (2003). “Further Reflections on Amazonian Environmental History: Transformations of Rivers and Streams.” Latin American Research Review 38.3:165–187.

      46 Rodríguez, Mariela Eva. “Etnografía adjetivada: ¿Antídoto contra la subalternización?,” in Perspectivas etnográficas contemporáneas en Argentina. Eds. Leticia Katzer and Horacio Chiavazza. Mendoza: Instituto de Arqueología y Etnología de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, 2019, 274–332.

      47 Sahlins, Marshall. “Notes on the Original Affluent Society,” in Man the Hunter. Richard B. Lee and I. DeVore. New York: Aldine Publishing, 1968, 85–89.

      48 ———. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1972.

      49 Sahlins, Marshall Erman R. Service. Evolution and Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.

      50 Saunders, Joe. “Are We Fixing to Make the Same Mistake Again?” in Signs of Power: The Rise of Cultural Complexity in the Southeast. Eds. Jon L. Gibson and P. J. Carr. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2004.

      51 Saunders, Joe and Thurman Allen. “The Archaic Period,” Louisiana Archaeology 22 (1998): 1–30.

      52 ———. “Jaketown Revisited,” Southeastern Archaeology 22 (2003): 155–164.

      53 Saunders, J.W., R.D. Mandel, R.T. Saucier, E. Thurman Allen, C.T. Hallmark, J.K. Johnson… R. Jones. “A Mound Complex in Louisiana at 5400–5000 Years B.P,” Science 277–5333(1997), 1796–1799.

      54 Spalding, Karen. Huarochirí. An Andean Society under Inca and Spanish Rule. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1984.

      55 Stern, Steve. Peru’s Indian Peoples and the Challenge of Spanish Conquest: Huamanga to 1640. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982.

      56 Verdesio, Gustavo.“Endless Dispossession: The Charrua Re-emergence in Uruguay in the Light of Settler Colonialism,” Settler Colonial Studies (2020a): 1–25. doi: 10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823752.

      57 Verdesio, Gustavo. “Forgotten Territorialities: The Materiality of Indigenous Pasts,” Nepantla. Views from South 2/1 (2001): 85–114.

      58 ———. “Invisible at a Glance: Indigenous Cultures of the Past, Ruins, Archaeological Sites, and Our Regimes of Visibility,” in Ruins of Modernity. Eds. Julia Hell and Andreas Schonle. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010, 339–353.

      59 ———. “Un fantasma recorre el Uruguay: La reemergencia charrúa en un ‘país sin indios’,” Cuadernos de Literatura18/36 (2014): 86–107.

      60 ———. “It Comes with the Territory: Indigenous Materialities and Western Knowledge,” in The Routledge Hispanic Studies Companion to Colonial Latin America and the Caribbean (1492–1898). Eds. Santa Arias and Yolanda Martínez-San Miguel. London: Routledge, 2020b, 267–280.

      61 ———. “Towards a New Production of Time: Rethinking Indigenous and Collaborative Archaeologies,” Interventions. International Journal of Postcolonial Studies (2021): 41.

      62 Woodward, Christopher. In Ruins. A Journey through History, Art, and Literature. New York: Vintage Books, 2001.

      63 Yoffee, Norman. Myths of the Archaic State. Evolution of the Earliest Cities, States, and Civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

      64 Zimmerman, Larry J. Indios norteamericanos. Creencias y ritos visionarios, santos y embusteros, espíritus terrestres y celestes. Koln: Taschen, 2002.

       José Rabasa

      The concept of writing violence points to the ways in which violence is written about and the ways writing itself exerts violence in colonial and postcolonial texts. The notion of the colonial/postcolonial divide bears less on a historical break traditionally marked by the wars of independence in Latin America than with the interrogation of the logic of colonialism. As such, the “postcolonial” dates back to the very earliest moments in the Spanish invasion of the Americas; it is coterminous with colonialism and the undoing of its civilizing claims. Colonialism and the justification of wars of conquest depend on the articulation of moral, religious, and epistemological grounds. If religion and morality are quite apparent in the denunciation of idolatry,