In a similar study, Sharma, Agarwal, and Balani (2016) studied the effect of shapes of ZnO nanostructures on their bactericidal property. Here the author synthesized ZnO microrods and microdisks from ZnO NPs of size (<100 nm) using hydrothermal route. The antimicrobial activity of ZnO structures against Gram‐positive S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis revealed that minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of all the three materials was within 0.5 μg/ml, whereas the same for Gram‐negative bacteria E. coli was in the range of 70–76 μg/ml. The mechanism of action involved the production of H2O2, Zn2+ ions release, and the presence of surface oxygen vacancies. In general, the release of metal ion from a material depends on the plane area of the material. Notably, the ZnO microdisks had the highest basal plane area, which led to the highest release of Zn2+ ions from the surface (75.3 ± 14.6 μg/l in MilliQ water and 631.3 ± 17.3 μg/l in LB medium) in 48 hours at 37 °C. Hence the mechanism of action of ZnO microdisks and microrods were suggested to be through release of Zn2+ ions whereas the release of H2O2 and Zn2+ along with cellular internalization was in case of ZnO particles (Sharma et al., 2016). Cha et al. (2015) studied the effect of ZnO NMs over a model enzyme β‐galactosidase (GAL), which can be extrapolated to similar bacterial enzymes. The inhibition mechanisms of three different shapes of ZnO NMs – pyramid, plates, and spheres – were studied using: Michaelis Menten, Lineweaver Burk, and Eadie–Hofstee kinetics models. Among the three different shapes, nanoplates exhibited competitive inhibition over GAL whereas the ZnO NMs of pyramid shape exhibited noncompetitive mechanism. Such variation in the inhibitory effects has been explained by the ability of particular shapes to partially enter the grooves of the active site and inhibit the catalytic reaction by interfering in the reconfiguration of enzyme during substrate binding (Cha et al., 2015). The sharp edges and the apexes of nanopyramids could have been a better geometrical match to the surface of enzyme. These factors further determine the association of proteins with NMs and hence their inhibition mechanism. This clearly showed that the antimicrobial property and mechanism of action strongly depend on the shape of NMs. However, the antimicrobial property of different NMs or same NMs synthesized by different methods could not be generalized on a particular shape. Since, along with shape, the organization of active facets present in the particular NM also plays a crucial role in determining its antimicrobial property. Hence, along with shape other sub‐parameters such as facets organization and crystallinity should also be taken into account. Apart from size and shape, surface chemistry is the third most important factor that dictates the antimicrobial property, which we discuss briefly in the following section.
1.13 Effects of Functionalization on the Antimicrobial Property of Nanomaterials
Although several antimicrobial agents have been developed so far, they are still not able to meet the required therapeutic index. Even though NMs are well‐known for their renowned antibacterial activities, their application is still limited due to their certain nonspecific toxicity. In order to improve antimicrobial therapeutic index and reduce the nonspecific toxicity, biofunctionalization or chemical modification of NPs with bioactive molecules has emerged as a plausible and promising solution. The selection of a NM along with a rational biomolecule is likely to improve the applicability of the composite NM.
Several techniques have been employed to functionalize NMs such as covalent bonding (Veerapandian et al., 2010), non‐covalent bonding (Knopp, Tang, & Niessner, 2009), simple coating or deposition (Bunker et al., 2007), stober technique (Luckarift et al., 2007), coupling reaction‐assisted immobilization (Wang et al., 2004), reverse micelle and sol–gel technique (Yang et al., 2004). Photo‐Fenton oxidation, radiofrequency plasma, and vacuum‐UV radiation methods have been employed for click chemistry (Mazille et al., 2010). Protein and peptides, especially those with cationic nature, have been found to be toxic against many drug‐resistant microbes. The antimicrobial property of these proteins or peptides depends on the ability to form α‐helical or β‐sheets or α‐helical bundles because of the interaction with anionic bacterial cell wall and self‐association in solution state (Fernandez‐Lopez et al., 2001; Oren et al., 2002). In an earlier study, the antibacterial activity of hen egg lysozyme‐conjugated polystyrene latex NPs against Micrococcus lysodeikticus was studied. It was observed from the study that antimicrobial property of cationic NP‐conjugated enzyme was twice that of free enzyme (Satishkumar & Vertegel, 2008). Similar to proteins, carbohydrate also enhances the antimicrobial property of NMs. Veerapandian et al. (2010) reported that the glucosamine (amino sugar) functionalization of silver NPs improved the antimicrobial property against eight Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria. The functionalization of glucosamine over silver NPs enhanced the interaction and penetration of NPs into bacterial cell, which improved the antibacterial activity of glucosamine‐functionalized silver NPs (Veerapandian et al., 2010). Next to proteins and carbohydrates, lipids also possess antimicrobial property and they are part of innate immune system. The common antimicrobial lipids found in skin cells of human involve sphingosine, dihydro‐sphingosine, 6‐hydrosphingosine, sapienic– acid, and lauric acid (Drake et al., 2008). A study reported that oleic acid‐stabilized silver NPs exhibited highest antimicrobial property against E. coli and S. aureus. It was observed that the hybrid material produced a quick response over E. coli than S. aureus. The stabilization of oleic acid improved the permeability of the NP inside the bacterial cell, which inhibited or altered the cellular transport across the bacterial cell and resulted in bacterial cell death (Le et al., 2010). Apart from other biomolecules like proteins/peptides, carbohydrates, lipids,