Structurally, these texts are no different from those of the preceding Neo‐Babylonian period; most of the larger archives straddle the year of conquest, 539 BCE. There was not fundamental change at this juncture. What internal developments can be seen are gradual, not abrupt. The social groups to which the archive holders belong include many priests as well as entrepreneurs and traders of various degrees of prosperity (archive‐holding craftsmen and subsistence farmers are attested but rare); and there are of course the huge archives of the Eanna and Ebabbar temples. The contents of the tablets include household and property management and various types of business (agricultural matters, local and long‐distance trading, tax and income farming, manufacturing, financial transactions ranging from small‐scale money‐lending to ambitious investments in business companies; Jursa 2010). Apart from occasional references to the Great King (always a distant and shadowy figure), to members of the royal family and their personnel, and to Persian officials (e.g. Tavernier 2007), Persian rule is reflected most clearly in the documentation for tax and service obligations, where one hears, for example, about the construction of several royal palaces, the building program of Darius in Susa, and the construction of a canal (the Kabar canal) that was to link southern Babylonia with the Susa region (see Chapter 67 Taxes and Tribute and Tolini 2011).
From later periods, we have fewer than 100 tablets dating to the reign of Xerxes from all of Babylonia (after 484 BCE). From the rest of the fifth century (reigns of Artaxerxes I and Darius II), there are perhaps as many as 1500 tablets (it is not always possible to assign isolated texts dated to the reign of an Artaxerxes to one of the three kings of that name). The most important find spots are Babylon, Borsippa, Cutha, Kiš, and Nippur; tablets from the south (Ur, Uruk, Larsa) are far less numerous. In the fourth century, there is a further decrease in tablet numbers: perhaps around 400 tablets can be dated to this period (on the assumption that the bulk of the Artaxerxes tablets of the Esangila archive dates to Artaxerxes II or III). Only a handful of tablets dates to the reign of Darius III. The most important fourth‐century find spot is Babylon; also Kiš and Borsippa in the north and Ur in the south yielded some coherent groups. Notable tablet groups, apart from the Esangila archive, include the highly anomalous Murašû archive from Nippur and the Bēlšunu and Tattannu archives. While the former is the archive of a family of Babylonian businessmen active within the sphere of state‐sponsored agriculture and tax farming, i.e. in an area of the economy that is documented, albeit in a different form, also in the early Achaemenid period, the latter two archives belonged to extraordinarily rich Babylonian families with close ties to the Achaemenid government, and, in one case at least, with a tradition of holding high offices: this stratum of Babylonian society is not well represented in the earlier period. The comparatively small number of sources notwithstanding, much is known about the institutions of Achaemenid rule over Babylonia during the Late Achaemenid period because of this particular socioeconomic setting of the material.
REFERENCES
1 Abraham, K. (2004). Business and Politics Under the Persian Empire. Bethesda: University Press of Maryland.
2 Baker, H.D. (2008). Babylon in 484 BC: the excavated archival tablets as a source for urban history. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, 98, pp. 100–116.
3 Clancier, P. (2009). Les bibliothèques en Babylonie dans la deuxième moitié du 1er millénaire av. J.‐C., Alter Orient und Altes Testament 363. Münster: Ugarit‐Verlag.
4 Donbaz, V., Stolper, M.W. (1997). Istanbul Murašû Texts. Leiden: Nederlands Instituutvoor het Nabije Oosten.
5 Fadhil, A., Hilgert, M. (2008). The cultic lament “a gal‐gal buru14 su‐su” in a manuscript from the “Sippar library”. Zeitschrift für Orient‐Archäologie, 1, pp. 154–193.
6 Frahm, E., Jursa, M. (2011). Neo‐Babylonian Letters and Contracts from the Eanna Archive, Yale Oriental Series, Babylonian Texts 21. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
7 Hackl, J. (2017). Additions to the Late Achaemenid textual record, Part I: texts from Uruk. Orientalia, 86/1, 42‐96.
8 Hackl, J. (2021). Materialien zu Recht, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im Nordbabylonien der spätachämenidischen und hellenistischen Zeit. Urkundenlehre, Archivkunde, Texte. Achaemenid History 17. Leiden: NINO.
9 Henkelman, W.F.M., Kuhrt, A., Rollinger R., and Wiesehöfer, J. (2011). Herodotus and Babylon reconsidered. In R. Rollinger, B. Truschnegg, and R. Bichler (eds.), Herodot und das Persische Weltreich – Herodotus and the Persian Empire, Classica et Orientalia 3. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 449–470.
10 Jursa, M. (2005a). Das Archiv des Bēl‐eṭēri‐Šamaš. In H.D. Baker, M. Jursa (eds.), Approaching the Babylonian Economy: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Economic History of Babylonia in the First Millennium Held in Vienna, July 2004. Münster: Ugarit‐Verlag, pp. 197–268.
11 Jursa, M. (2005b). Neo‐Babylonian Legal and Administrative Documents: Typology, Contents and Archives, Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record 1. Münster: Ugarit‐Verlag.
12 Jursa, M. (2007). The transition of Babylonia from the Neo‐Babylonian empire to Achaemenid rule. In H. Crawford (ed.), Regime Change in the Ancient Near East and Egypt: From Sargon of Agade to Saddam Hussein, Proceedings of the British Academy 136. London: The British Academy, pp. 73–94.
13 Jursa, M.J., with contributions by J. Hackl, B. Jankovic, K. Kleber, E.E. Payne, C. Waerzeggers and M. Weszeli (2010). Aspects of the Economic History of Babylonia in the First Millennium BC.: Economic Geography, Economic Mentalities, Agriculture, the Use of Money and the Problem of Economic Growth, Alter Orient und Altes Testament 377. Münster: Ugarit‐Verlag.
14 Jursa, M., Stolper, M.W. (2007). From the Tattannu archive fragment. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 97, pp. 243–281.
15 Kessler, K. (2004). Urukäische Familien versus babylonische Familien: Die Namengebung in Uruk, die Degradierung der Kulte von Eanna und der Aufstieg des Gottes Anu. Altorientalische Forschungen, 31, pp. 237–262.
16 Kose, A. (1998). Uruk: Architektur IV: Von der Seleukiden‐ bis zur Sasanidenzeit. Mainz: von Zabern.
17 Lenzen, H. (1958). Der Ningischzida‐Tempel in Qd, Qe, XIV 5, XV 1. In J. Schmidt (ed.), XIV: Vorläufiger Bericht über die von dem Deutschen Archäologischen Institut und der Deutschen Orient‐Gesellschaft aus Mitteln der Deutschen Forschungegemeinschaft unternommenen Ausgrabung in Uruk‐Warka. Berlin: Mann, pp. 15–17.
18 Oelsner, J. (2007). Das zweite Regierungsjahr des Xerxes (484/3 v. Chr.) in Babylonien. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 97, pp. 289–303.
19 Ossendrijver, M. (2012). Babylonian Mathematical Astronomy: Procedure Texts. Berlin: Springer.
20 Pedersén, O. (1998). Archives and Libraries in the Ancient Near East 1500–300 B.C. Bethesda: University Press of Maryland.
21 Pedersén, O. (2005). Archive und Bibliotheken in Babylon: Die Tontafeln der Grabung Robert Koldeweys 1899–1917, Abhandlungen der Deutschen Orient‐Gesellschaft 25. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker‐Verlag.
22 Peirce, L., Wunsch, C. (2014). Documents of Judean Exiles and West Semites in Babylonia in the Collection of David Sofer. CUSAS 28. Bethesda: CDL Press.
23 Pirngruber,