Fig. 92.—Grotesque effects of curved surfaces.
It is often considered an embarrassing matter to fix precisely the value of two lights. Nothing, however, can be easier in reality, as we will show. In comparing different lights, it is necessary to bear in mind the amount of waste, the colour of the light, the luminous value of the source, and the steadiness of the flame. The luminous value of a lamp-burner is generally equalled by that of a wax candle, and we will take as an example one of those at six to the pound. Very precise appliances are used for this experiment when great exactness is required; but it is easy to calculate in a simple manner the differences in ordinary lights. Supposing we desire to test the value of light given by a lamp and a wax candle, they must both be placed on the table at an equal height, B and A, (fig. 93), in front of some opaque body, A, and then a large sheet of paper must be fixed as vertically as possible to form a screen. When B and A are lighted, two shadows, E and F, are produced, to which it is easy to give exactly the same intensity, by advancing or withdrawing one of the two sources of light. The intensities of the two lights will then be inversely proportional to the squares of the measured distances, AB and AC. By a similar careful calculation it has been possible to draw up a table of the relative values of various ordinary lights. We have not included here the electric light, which has recently attracted so much attention, because this system of lighting can hardly be said to have yet penetrated the domain of domestic life; but when we consider electricity, as we hope to do in a future part, we intend to study this question fully, for there is no doubt that electricity is becoming more and more adapted to our daily life.
Fig. 93.—An elementary Photometer.
The measurement of intensity of light is called Photometry, and the instruments used are Photometers. Bunsen’s instrument consists of a screen of writing-paper, saturated in places with spermaceti to make it transparent. A sperm candle is placed on one side, and the light to be compared on the other. The lights are provided with graduated bars, and these lights are then removed farther and farther from the screen till the spots of grease are invisible. The relative intensities are as the squares of the distance from the screen.
Fig. 94.—The soap-bubble.
We append a table showing the comparative cost of light given by Dr. Frankland at the Royal Institution some few years ago. The standard of comparison was 20 sperm candles burning for 10 hours at the rate of 120 grains an hour:—
| s. | d. | |
| Wax | 7 | 2½ |
| Sperm Oil | 1 | 10 |
| Paraffin | 3 | 10 |
| Spermaceti | 6 | 8 |
| Coal Gas | 0 | 4½ |
| Paraffin Oil | 0 | 6 |
| Tallow | 2 | 8 |
| Cannel Gas | 0 | 3 |
| Rock Oil | 0 | 7⅔ |
There are many other interesting experiments connected with Light—Spectrum Analysis, etc., etc.—all of which we will defer for a time until we have examined the Eye and some effects produced upon it by Light, illustrated by numerous diagrams in the pages next following.
CHAPTER X.
VISION AND OPTICAL ILLUSIONS—THE EYE DESCRIBED—ACCOMMODATION OF THE EYE—CHROMATIC ABERRATION—SPINNING TOPS.
The eye is an optical instrument that may be compared with those constructed by physicists themselves; the media of which it is composed have surfaces like those which enter into the construction of optical instruments. It was Kepler who at the end of the eighteenth century discovered the passage of light into the eye. Soon after the discovery of the inner chamber he found that the eye realized the conditions that Porta had combined to obtain the reflection of external objects.
Fig. 95.—Structure of the eye.
We will now briefly state that the coats of this organ are constituted of a fibrous membrane, T (fig. 95), termed sclerotic, which is opaque, except in the anterior portion of the eye, where it forms the transparent cornea. The crystalline, C, enshrined behind the cornea, is the convergent lens of the inner chamber; it is covered with a transparent membrane, or capsule, and is bathed in two fluids, the aqueous humour, between the crystalline humour and the cornea, and the vitreous body, a gelatinous humour lodged between the crystalline and the back of the eye. The image of exterior objects which is produced by the passage of light through these refracting surfaces, is received by a nervous membrane, the retina, B, formed by an expansion of the optic nerve, N. We must also mention the choroid, a membrane lined with a dark pigment, which absorbs the light, and prevents interior reflections, and in front of the crystalline lens, a curtain with an opening, H, called the iris, which gives to the eyes their colour of blue, grey, or black. The opening in the centre of the iris is called the pupil.
The penetration of light through the surfaces of the eye is easily demonstrated. An object throws divergent rays on the cornea, a part penetrates into the eye and falls upon the retina, leaving a perfectly retained image of the object. Magendie has proved in the following manner the truth of this mathematical deduction. The eye of a rabbit is very similar to an albino’s; that is to say, the choroid contains no black pigment, but a transparent matter, and when placed before a brilliant object, the image can be seen inverted on the retina. The experiment succeeds also with the eye of a sheep or a cow, if the sclerotic has been lessened. The optic centre of the eye is the point where the secondary axes cross; the optic axis passes through the geometrical axis of the organ, and directs itself spontaneously towards the point that attracts the eye.
Fig. 96.—Diagram of mode of vision.
We will now point out in what distinct vision consists. A screen placed behind a lens will only receive the image of a lighted object, A B, if placed in a position, R R (fig. 96). If placed nearer at R″ R″, or further off at R´ R´, the light from the object is thrown on the screen, and the image is confused. To prove the imperfection of sight which is shown by the application of these theoretic rules, MM. Boutan and d’Alméïda10 cite the following experiment:—If the head of a pin is placed from one to two inches from the eye, nothing will be perceived but a confused haziness of vague outline. The distance of distinct vision is that at which an object of small dimensions may be placed to be plainly perceived. This distance, which averages fifteen inches, varies with different individuals. It can be determined for different