Searching for Goor Jaarin
A less risky strategy to migrate is to marry a migrant who is already overseas. Most of the migrants’ wives I interviewed said they would like to join their husbands abroad, or at least go visit, but few were willing to claim that desire as a motivating factor in their marriage to a migrant. Many were happy, however, to project that motivation onto other migrants’ wives. A young woman named Mariama—herself a migrant’s wife—drew a direct comparison between women who marry migrants and women who marry “toubabs,” or Europeans. “It’s only to travel. A woman will do anything to change countries. There are lots of women like that.”10 She was herself, she assured me, not that type of woman.
The employment obstacles and inflation woes that trouble men in Senegal have a parallel impact on working women as well. Mariama gave me the example of her own financial calculations as a gas station shop clerk in Dakar before she married a migrant. She worked the night shift, from 9 p.m. to 9 a.m. five days a week and was paid a salary of 100,000 cfa (CFA Franc), which is about $200 US per month. She tabulated that every day she would pay 2,000 cfa for her transport to and from work and another 500 to 1,000 cfa to buy herself food at her shift break; these expenses would eat away at her already trivial monthly earnings.
Mariama went on to describe the difficulties of accumulating wealth and saving on a meager salary in a culture of communal sharing and low employment.
When I worked, it was difficult, everyone counted on you, everyone. They don’t know how much you are paid, but they know that, “Mariama, dey, she works!” At the end of the month, everyone calls you, “I have this or that problem.” It’s just you with your 100,000 cfa a month—it’s not enough!
Mariama lived in her family’s home while working, and thus didn’t pay rent, but she felt pressure as an employed person to contribute to household expenses, to help her siblings who were still in school, and to make her own displays of generosity and giving at family celebrations and rituals.
These paltry salaries and insecure working conditions are the types of available employment that workers in Dakar must negotiate. Mariama explained that these sorts of considerations make labor migration appeal to many Senegalese.
Where I worked, if you are sick, it is you who pays for your care. You don’t have benefits or paid vacation. That’s why everyone wants [to travel/migrate] … because over there at least you can work, you can réaliser quelque chose.…11 Here you can work for years and never even have a bank account!
Though Mariama insists that her desire to go abroad and work to support her parents did not factor into her decision to marry a migrant, she hopes that her husband Serigne will eventually bring her overseas to join him. She envisions working abroad and sending money home to support her aging parents.
As this book makes clear, however, marrying a migrant does not necessarily lead to migration. The common Senegalese vision of the migrant’s wife—the “jabaaru immigré”—is one who does not migrate, but rather receives remittances from abroad and awaits the visits of her husband. Women are far more likely to be accused of marrying a migrant for “intérêt” (self-interest or financial advantages) than for the hope of migrating, and this was another motivator my interviewees denied in their own cases but projected onto their peers with wild abandon.
Pursuing relationships for intérêt, rather than with more respectable intentions such as religious or filial duty, is considered regrettably commonplace in contemporary Senegal. Nyamnjoh (2005) describes the growing gap between the increasing availability of images of consumerism and consumables and the declining economic conditions of most sub-Saharan countries as pushing young Senegalese to pursue romantic and sexual relationships with wealthier partners “for consumer opportunities and consumer citizenship” (2005: 296). It would be inaccurate and an oversimplification to—as Nyamnjoh does—restrict women’s motivation to marry with intérêt to a greedy desire for material things. The reality of what most women yearn for is both more modest and more complex. A closer look at what women wish to do with their wealth belies the idea of sacrificing morality and seeking money for the sake of mere consumption alone. The longing for disposable income among Senegalese women comprises not only the desire to adorn oneself with expensive locally tailored clothing and European “pret-à-porter” items, but also the ability to give generously at religious holidays and life-cycle ceremonies as well as to support elderly parents and other relatives. Women seek money explicitly to play a role in Senegal’s moral economy and to garner religious honor (Buggenhagen 2012).
Furthermore, I depart from Nyamnjoh—and many Senegalese—who point to women’s desire to make financially advantageous marital unions as a new phenomenon that signals moral decline. Senegalese culture has long emphasized the importance of a husband as provider, and this quality traditionally has been given value equal to other characteristics, such as provenance from a good family, strong character, and religious piety. Women always have sought to attach themselves to goor jaarin, or a man who is worth something. Even as women join the workforce more and more, the expectation remains that a husband must provide financially (“yor”) for his wife. Physical desire and emotional compatibility figure into marital calculations, yet ideal husbands must be goor jaarin—men who fulfill their marital duties to their wives by providing them with material support (Hannaford and Foley 2015).
The fallout from privatization and structural adjustment reforms in the 1980s has meant the disappearance of jobs in the public sector and the formal economy, including the role of the Senegalese civil servant—once an archetypical goor jaarin. As elsewhere in the region, the decline of the public sector and the apparent “end of salary” (Mbembe and Roitman 1995) have produced disruptions in social life, including the aforementioned delaying of marriage among men. For women, this means a parallel and unwelcome delay despite the continued importance of marriage for women as a means of obtaining social adulthood and financial security. A Wolof proverb states that “a bad husband is better than a good boyfriend,”12 emphasizing the indispensability of marriage. As the Senegalese sociologist Fatou Binetou Dial points out, although “the ideal model of a good husband no longer corresponds to the realities of marriage, … women continue to believe in it” (Dial 2008: 181). For many women, contemporary challenges and the increasing inability of men to fulfill the traditional role as breadwinner has prompted innovation within and outside of the institution of marriage, including through long-distance marriage to migrants.
Though Mariama had been dating another man for more than a year, she had lost hope that he would ever propose; and, at 30 years old, she felt that her window of desirability was closing. When Serigne—a distant relative by marriage and a migrant home on vacation from Italy—proposed to her, she felt compelled to say yes. Though Serigne was many years her senior, of rural origin, and not nearly as flashy or handsome as her Dakar boyfriend, Serigne was offering Mariama something that no other boyfriend had—the social status of wifehood.
Desiring to marry a goor jaarin, a man who can provide, is not in itself a new phenomenon for Senegalese women—yet marrying migrants represents a change in the conception of goor jaarin for Senegalese women and their families (Hannaford and Foley 2015).13 Changing dynamics surrounding migration and class in Senegal facilitate the increased desirability of migrant spouses, overturning other older strictures of social order that once determined these choices. The following examines the way that changing understandings of social class and what constitutes social capital make migrant suitors more desirable—though not necessarily better—spouses.
Class, Courtship, Marriage, and Migration
Bruno Riccio noted a profound ambivalence surrounding the figure of the visiting