Day-to-day sexual norms in the New World did not conform to the gender ideals mandated by the Council of Trent (1545–1563).56 As a result, this book focuses on the textual tensions and evasions of political leaders, clerics, and moralizers who censured sexually entrepreneurial women while simultaneously tolerating them and only sporadically persecuting them. To introduce these cultural and juridical contradictions, chapter 1 details early-modern legal, literary, and popular understandings of the commonly used terms ramera and alcahueta, using fictional examples as well as court cases set in sixteenth-century Mexico City. Spanish law codes shaped the American experience of transactional sex to a degree, but lacking a documentary record, it is difficult to know if the important Spanish institution of the legal brothel became popular in the New World. Instead, the scant surviving texts testify to exchanges of money and gifts for sex and intimacy that took place within family homes. Chapter 1 explores several other distinctly New World interpretations of transactional sex, such as how, from the first decades of Spanish rule in Mexico, women of African and indigenous descent shaped Spanish American understandings of how to negotiate and carry out illicit relationships, especially in the familiar, popular, and sometimes lucrative occupation of bawdry.57
Chapter 2 examines the crown’s motivations for closing regulated brothels and investigates the negotiation of increasingly illegal sexual transactions in the seventeenth century. American tribunals of the Holy Office of the Spanish Inquisition targeted the erotic magic that often accompanied selling sex in this era. Bawds and sorceresses (including women of African and indigenous descent) merged as a conjoined threat. Although brothel manageresses still enjoyed an elite clientele, simultaneously they faced suppression due to royal mandates to close their houses. Despite the patronage of viceregal officials, these women endured increasing stigmatization after this first step in criminalization. Even with their growing illegality and vilification, in seventeenth-century cities women offered a multilayered range of sex for sale, racially and socially diverse, in a variety of settings. However, archival evidence remains sparse until the eighteenth century, when, under the reforms of the Bourbon dynasty, documented prosecutions picked up significantly as more modern mechanisms for urban policing developed.58
The first two chapters provide the early-modern historical and juridical background required to understand the new categorization of women as “prostitutes” in the 1700s, the topic of chapters 3, 4, and 5. In the eighteenth century, a substantial paper trail records how streetwalkers, middle-class mistresses, and elite courtesans endured more frequent judicial encounters than in previous centuries.59 But in a typically viceregal paradox, increasing surveillance tended toward a benign paternalism for certain kinds of women, especially kept women (chapter 3) and elite courtesans (chapter 4). These chapters narrate the lives of several women who lived in comfort and respectability with their families, or were supported by their lovers, but who withstood neighborly gossip or official campaigns against them due to their suspicious wealth and noisy social lives.
Chapter 4 examines the pinnacles of the Spanish American demimonde, where transactional sex and professional theater and dance intersected.60 These women wrote themselves into the archives due to their self-promotion and their own materialism, libertinism, and social ambition. Starting in the seventeenth century, these courtesans drew attention to themselves as they flaunted sumptuary laws in their triumphantly opulent clothes, housing, and lifestyle, underwritten by rich and courtly lovers. Courtesans could call on powerful men to sprint to their aid at a moment’s notice, but despite their personal power, their benefactors cherished them as delicate creatures needing their protection. These legendary symbols of viceregal decadence continue to fascinate us to the present through their portrayals in popular culture.
At the other end of the spectrum, chapter 5 turns to poor women recorded into the nightly logs because late-colonial reformers made a concerted effort to clear the streets of drunks, street solicitors, and vagrants. The police dockets for the 1790s preserve traces of the interactions between patrolmen and women working on the street.61 This extensive documentation allows for statistical analysis of women arrested for solicitation or public lewd acts. The authorities reacted by attempting to force these women back into their family homes or jobs as servants, the very situations that compelled them to sell sex in the first place. Although hundreds of women appear in the police notations, still their actual crimes often remain very vague.
Chapter 6, set in the early nineteenth century, remains in this plebeian milieu but concentrates on two women’s complex efforts to self-fashion themselves as respectable ladies. In the context of an increasingly “modern” idea of regulating prostitutes and brothels, these two women consistently denied accusations made by nosy neighbors as well as ineffective street policing by the weakening imperial state. With trial-based performances, they rejected efforts made by men, their families, and even law enforcement to confine them inside of more traditional partnered arrangements. The woman known as La Sargenta (“Sergeant Lady” or “the Sergeant’s Woman”) assumed the character of a quiet servant, even while her accusers portrayed her as a drunken streetwalker. Around the same time, a brothel manager and clothes dealer also carried out an elaborate manipulation of multiple identities in her trial.
Perhaps because eighteenth-century courtesans often worked as dancers or actresses, their statements take on a dramatic tone, an exaggeration of the normal role-playing common to all juridical case files. Even beyond the idea of the accused women’s consciously and simultaneously performing their sexuality and respectability, the connection between theater and public sexuality helps explain a new judicial attitude and rhetoric that emerges in the final decades of the Spanish American viceroyalties. Chapter 7 explores late-viceregal cases involving mothers accused of trying to convince men to pay for nonmarital sex with their daughters, as well as brothels organized inside of family homes, managed by young women’s parents or sisters. The official language and attitudes in these files echoes early-eighteenth-century popular “she-tragedies,” in which the heroine’s sexual desirability led to her own “fatal suffering.” Through no moral fault of her own, the leading character suffers “a sexual crime in which she participates unwittingly or even unwillingly,” creating an idea of women as passive objects of desire. These performances of violation link sexual voyeurism to pain and violence.62 The cases discussed in chapter 7 follow this theatrical plotline. When judicial officials dwelled on extensive verbiage describing the physical and emotional torment of women they viewed as victimized by late-eighteenth– and early-nineteenth–century panderers (including their older sisters and parents), they reified misogyny and paternalism through their understanding of women as weak and sexually passive. In contrast to chapter 5, here they “rescued” these young women from their own families, only to place them