Solid State Chemistry and its Applications. Anthony R. West. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Anthony R. West
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Химия
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781118695579
Скачать книгу
which, at first sight, appear too small, by pushing apart anions and expanding the structure (as in eutactic structures). By contrast, cations tend not to occupy sites that are too large, unless the structure can adjust itself, by twisting or distorting the anion array so as to reduce the size of the sites; this happens in many distorted perovskite structures in which cations are too small to occupy large 12‐coordinate sites and a partial structural collapse occurs (see Section 1.17.7). Thus, cations do not occupy large sites in which they can ‘rattle’. An interesting intermediate situation occurs in some structures in which a cation site is marginally too large. The cation can then undergo small off‐centre displacements giving rise to high polarisability, high permittivity and the phenomenon of ferroelectricity (Section 8.7).

       1.15.3.3 Location of tetrahedral and octahedral sites in an fcc unit cell; bond length calculations

      We have seen how T+, T and O sites occur between pairs of cp layers, Fig. 1.23, and how fcc and ccp structures are often equivalent, Fig. 1.20. We can now see where the T+, T and O sites are located within an fcc unit cell that has anions, X, at corners and face centres (A, B, C, and D), Fig. 1.24. The octahedral sites are easiest to locate; they are at edge‐centre 1, 2, 3 and body‐centre 4 positions. If the unit cell has length a, the M–X distance for octahedral sites is a/2.

      In order to see the T+, T sites clearly, it is convenient to divide the unit cell into eight minicubes by bisecting each cell edge (dashed lines). These minicubes contain anions at only four of the eight corners; in the middle of each minicube is a tetrahedral site, either T+ or T. There are two orientations for the minicubes, and therefore for the T sites, as shown in Fig. 1.25; relative to the parent unit cell, Fig. 1.24, the T tetrahedra have their apices pointing in the [ModifyingAbove 1 With bar ModifyingAbove 1 With bar ModifyingAbove 1 With bar] direction and the T+ sites in the [111] direction.

Schematic illustration of available cation sites, 1–12, in an fcc anion array.

       Figure 1.24 Available cation sites, 1–12, in an fcc anion array.

normal upper M minus normal upper X equals one half left-bracket 3 left-parenthesis a slash 2 right-parenthesis squared right-bracket Superscript one half Baseline equals a StartRoot 3 EndRoot slash 4

      Twofold rotation axes and fourfold inversion axes run parallel to minicube edges but pass through pairs of opposite faces; there are three of these in total (see also Fig. 1.7c); mirror planes occur parallel to the set of lattice planes with indices {110}, and there are six of these in total [as in Fig. 1.9(c)]; threefold axes run parallel to <111> directions, four in total, Fig. 1.9(a); further details are in Appendix C.

       1.15.3.4 Description of crystal structures; fractional atomic coordinates

Schematic illustration of (a, b) tetrahedral sites T plus, T negative and their relation to a cube.

       Figure 1.25 (a, b) Tetrahedral sites T+, T– and their relation to a cube. (c) Bond length calculations and some symmetries of a tetrahedron.

000 comma one half one half 0 comma one half 0 one half comma 0 one half one half

      Only one corner, at 000, is included since the other seven, e.g. at 100, 010, etc., are equivalent and can be regarded as the corner atoms of adjacent cells. The alternative would be to list all eight corner atoms, with the qualification that only 1/8 of each belonged to the unit cell in question. This would be equivalent to, but much more cumbersome than, regarding one corner only as specifically belonging, completely, to our unit cell. Likewise, for each pair of opposite faces, e.g. ½½0 and ½½1, it is most convenient to regard ½½0 as belonging completely to our unit cell; ½½1 then becomes the bottom face centre in the cell above.

      The various cation positions in Fig. 1.24 have the following coordinates:

StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column octahedral 2nd Column 1 colon one half 00 3rd Column 2 colon 0 one half 0 4th Column 3 colon 00 one half 5th Column 4 colon one half one half one half 2nd Row 1st Column tetrahedral comma normal upper T Subscript plus Baseline 2nd Column 5 colon three quarters one quarter one quarter 3rd Column 6 colon one quarter three quarters one quarter 4th Column 7 colon one quarter one quarter three quarters 5th Column 8 colon three quarters three quarters three quarters 3rd Row 1st Column tetrahedral comma normal upper T Subscript minus Baseline 2nd Column 9 colon one quarter one quarter one quarter 3rd Column 10 colon three quarters three quarters one quarter 4th Column 11 colon one quarter three quarters three quarters 5th Column 12 colon three quarters one quarter three quarters EndLayout

      Note that there are four of each type of cation site, O, T+, T, in the unit cell, together with four anions. When different sites are fully or partially occupied by the cations, different structures are generated, as indicated in Table 1.4 and discussed later.

      1.15.4 Covalent network structures

      Materials such as diamond and silicon carbide, which have very strong, directional, covalent bonds, can also be described as cp structures or eutactic structures; many have the same structures as ionic compounds. Thus, one polymorph of SiC has the wurtzite structure and it is immaterial whether Si or C is regarded as the packing atom since the net result, a 3D framework of corner‐sharing tetrahedra, is the same. Diamond can be regarded as a sphalerite structure in which half of the C atoms form a ccp array and the other half occupy T+ sites, but again the two types of atom are equivalent. Classification of diamond as a eutactic structure is useful since in diamond all atoms are of the same size and it is unrealistic to distinguish between packing atoms and interstitial atoms.

      Many structures have mixed ionic–covalent bonding, e.g. ZnS and CrCl3; one advantage of describing them in terms of cp is that this can be done, if necessary, without reference to the type of bonding that is present.

      1.15.5 Molecular structures