69. Sand, W. and Gehrke, T., Extracellular polymeric substances mediate bioleaching/ biocorrosion via interfacial processes involving iron (III) ions and acidophilic bacteria. Res. Microbiol., 157, 49, 2006.
70. Schippers, A. and Sand, W., Bacterial leaching of metal sulfides proceeds by two indirect mechanisms via thiosulfate or via polysulfides and sulfur. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 319, 1999.
71. Ike, M., Yamashita, M., Kuroda, M., Microbial Removal and Recovery of Metals from Wastewater, in: Applied Bioengineering: Innovations and Future Directions, T. Yoshida (Ed.), pp. 573–595, Wiley Publisher, Weinheim, Germany, 2017.
72. Liu, S., Zhang, F., Chen, J., Sun, G., Arsenic removal from contaminated soil via biovolatilization by genetically engineered bacteria under laboratory conditions. J. Environ. Sci., 23, 1544, 2011.
73. Pepi, M., Gaggi, C., Bernardini, E., Focardi, S., Lobianco, A., Ruta, M., Nicolardi, V., Volterrani, M., Gasperini, S., Trinchera, G., Renzi, P., Gabellini, M., Focardi, S.E., Mercury-resistant bacterial strains Pseudomonas and Psychrobacter spp. isolated from sediments of Orbetello Lagoon (Italy) and their possible use in bioremediation processes. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 65, 85, 2011.
74. Żur, J., Wojcieszyńska, D., Guzik, U., Metabolic Responses of Bacterial Cells to Immobilization. Molecules, 21, 958, 2016.
75. Gadd, G.M., Bioremedial potential of microbial mechanisms of metal mobilization and immobilization. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 11, 271, 2000.
76. Raspor, P., Batič, M., Jamnik, P., Josić, D., Milačič, R., Paš, M., Recek, M., Režić-Dereani, V., Skrt, M., The influence of chromium compounds on yeast physiology: (A review). Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung., 47, 143, 2000.
77. Focardi, S., Pepi, M., Focardi, S.E., Microbial reduction of hexavalent chromium as a mechanism of detoxification and possible bioremediation applications, in: Biodegradation-Life of Science, R. Chamy (Ed.), pp. 321–347, InTech Open, London, UK, 2013.
78. Lee, J.H., Kim, M.G., Yoo, B., Myung, N.V., Maeng, J., Lee, T., Dohnalkova, A.C., Fredrickson, J.K., Sadowsky, M.J., Hur, H.G., Biogenic formation of photoactive arsenic-sulfide nanotubes by Shewanella sp. strain HN-41. PNAS, 104, 20410, 2007.
1 * Corresponding author: [email protected]
4
Microbial-Derived Polymers and Their Degradability Behavior for Future Prospects
Mohammad Asif Ali1,2*†, Aniruddha Nag1,3† and Maninder Singh1†
1Graduate School of Advanced Science and Technology, Energy and Environment Area, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan
2Soft Matter Sciences and Engineering Laboratory, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France
3School of Energy Science and Engineering, Vidyasirimedhi Institute of Science and Technology (VISTEC), Payupnai, Wangchan, Rayong, Thailand
Abstract
This chapter will focus on the development of bio-based polymers such as polyamides (PA), polylactide (PLA), and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) produced from renewable resources. NylonTM plastic is a kind of PA is a long chain fiber-forming recalcitrant and biodegradable and degradable polymer with diverse applications. Polylactic acid (PLA) is biodegradable aliphatic polyester derived from a naturally occurring organic acid (lactic acid). On the other hand, PHAs are the high molecular weight biodegradable polyesters synthesized by a wide array of microbes. However, they have an undesirable influence on the environment and substantially impact waste deposition and utilization. This chapter will emphasize the application and microbial degradability of these three kinds (PLA, PHA, and PA) of plastics.
Keywords: Degradation, polyamides microbes, polylactide, polyhydroxyalkanoates
4.1 Introduction
Research and development in the field of materials science over the past two decades have dramatically increased the production of synthetic or bio-based polymers [1, 2]. Plastics are usually hard to decompose but marginally affected by exposure to natural conditions such as sunlight, heat, oxygen, or biological and hydrolytic processes. Long-term undesirable accumulation of plastics in soil and water imposes a significant threat to the environment, and it can take from a year to decades for them to decompose [1–3]. Rising demands of plastics in both commercial and domestic sectors make it challenging for its proper disposal [4]. Although, several methods such as modification of molecular structure, side chain, reinforcement, and addition of some side-chain in plastics were developed, aiming to plastic waste management [5]. However, these modifications affect its molecular chain, morphology, chemistry, degree of polymerization, thermal properties, and hydrolytic behaviors [5]. There are widely used synthetic or bio-based polymers like polyamide (PA), polylactic acid (PLA), and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) with low melting temperature and degraded faster than other high-performance polymers such as PBO (polybenzoxazole), PBI (polybenzimidazole), and PI (polyimide) [1–3]. PAs were considered to be exciting materials since 1930 due to its molecular structure (-CONH-). However, its fibers are resistant to biodegradation because of chain symmetry [6]. But nylon degradation can occur after side-chain modification; scission of the chain, as well as a low oligomer, can be degraded [6, 7]. Hashimoto and Naoka et al. reported about especially nylon 4 degrade under the soil in the presence of marine bacteria [7, 8]. Recently, Kaneko et al. (2014) reported itaconic acid-based heterocyclic PAs, which are environmentally degradable under soil and water in the presence of UV light [8]. Naturally occurring polymers, bio-derived plastics, and synthetic bio-based plastics from renewable resources are the existing bases for establishing a sustainable society [9, 10]. Replacing bio-sourced materials over the existing fossil-fuel-based plastics are the prime focus of recent research [9]. However, different microbial-derived well-known bio-polyester like PHAs and PLA has low melting temperature tensile strength, and its biodegradable nature can replace the petrochemical-based plastics. There are various methods for the degradation of the polymer.
1 1. Thermal degradation
2 2. Photo-oxidative degradation
3 3. Hydrolytic degradation
4 4. Mechanochemical degradation
5 5. Soil degradation
6 6. Biodegradation
Some of the factors that affect the degradation process such as
- Color changes
- Scission of the backbone
- Modification of one or more end-groups
- Disruption of a side chain
- Mechanical
- Photo/thermal
- Chemical
- Cracking and charring (weight loss)
- The effect of light, heat, air, and moisture reflects the polymer structure.
Biodegradation can be defined as the breaking down material when exposed to microbes such as bacteria, fungi, actinobacteria, or other biological means anaerobically or aerobically [2]. Moreover, polymers biodegradation is possible by different enzymatic and non-enzymatic hydrolysis without thermal oxidation, radiolysis, or photolysis [3]. Alternatives to the existing fossil fuel and other non-renewable sources are the prime focus of today now. This chapter describes the broad spectrum of bioavailability, biosynthesis and biodegradability of PA, PLA, and PHAs.