129 Rossoliński-Liebe has also himself written several surveys of the historiography: “Debating, Obfuscating and Disciplining the Holocaust”; “Die anti-jüdische Massengewalt”; and “Survivor Testimonies.”
130 See Polonsky and Michlic, The Neighbors Respond; Forum on Jan Gross’s Neighbors; Michlic, “Coming to Terms with the ‘Dark Past’”; Törnquist-Plewa, “The Jedwabne Killings.” The government of the rightist, nationalist Law and Justice Party in Poland initiated libel proceedings against Gross in 2015 and attempted to strip him of his Order of Merit in 2016, but backed down in the face of protests. At issue was not Neighbors alone, but two other books by Gross, Fear and Golden Harvest.
131 Pohl, review of “Konterrevolutionäre Elemente sind zu erschießen,” and Rudling, “Bogdan Musial and the Question of Jewish Responsibility.”
132 There is a sympathetic account of Kulchytsky’s career and the evolution of his views on the Holodomor which does not mention his contribution to the rehabilitation of OUN: Klid, “Stanislav Kulchytsky.”
133 There is an excellent study of the working group within the context of a wider discussion of the effectiveness, or lack thereof, of historical commissions to resolve conflicts based on historical memory: Myshlovska, “Establishing the ‘Irrefutable Facts.’“
134 Kul’chyts’kyi, Problem OUN-UPA.
135 Kul’chyts’kyi, Orhanizatsiia ukrains’kykh natsionalistiv i Ukrains’ka povstans’ka armiia. Fakhovyi vysnovok.
136 Kul’chyts’kyi, Orhanizatsiia ukrains’kykh natsionalistiv i Ukrains’ka povstans’ka armiia. Istorychni narysy.
137 “Thus, the struggle of OUN-UPA was not about the destruction of the Poles as an ethnic minority on the territory of Ukraine, but about the removal of the ‘Polish factor’ as a weapon in the hands of the enemies of the Ukrainian liberation movement,” i.e., the Germans and the Soviet partisans. Kentii in Kul’chyts’kyi, Problem OUN-UPA, 89-90.
138 Kul’chyts’kyi, Orhanizatsiia ukrains’kykh natsionalistiv i Ukrains’ka povstans’ka armiia. Fakhovyi vysnovok, 3.
139 Amar et al., Strasti za Banderoiu. Arel, Ukraine List, nos. 441 and 442.
140 On historical politics in independent Ukraine, see Kasianov, “History, Politics and Memory.”
141 See McBride, “How Ukraine’s New Memory Commissar Is Controlling the Nation’s Past”; McBride, “Who’s Afraid of Ukrainian Nationalism?” 657-62; Himka, “Legislating Historical Truth.”
142 Himka, “The Lontsky Street Prison Memorial Museum.”
143 The partnerships are featured on the Center’s website, www.cdvr.org.ua (accessed 12 October 2018).
144 V”iatrovych, Stavlennia OUN do ievreiv.
145 This is discussed in the next chapter, 112-15.
146 Kurylo and Himka, “Iak OUN stavylasia do ievreiv?”
147 Bolianovs’kyi, Dyviziia “Halychyna”; Bolianovs’kyi, Ukrains’ki viis’kovi formuvannia.
148 Hrytsak, Strasti za natsionalizmom.
149 E.g., Rasevych, “L’vivs’kyi pohrom”; Rasevych, “Vyverty propahandy.”
150 Zaitsev, Ukrains’kyi integral’nyi natsionalizm.
151 Zaitsev, “Defiliada v Moskvi ta Varshavi”; Zaitsev, “Voienna doktryna.”
152 He has also written his own account of the historiography. Radchenko, “Ukrainian Historiography.”
153 Usach, “Chy mozhemo pochuty holos.”
154 Shliakhtych, “Arkhivno-slidchi spravy politsaiv”; Shliakhtych, “Stvorennia ta funktsionuvannia”; Shliakhtych, “Uchast’ mistsevoi dopomizhnoi politsii.”
155 Kolesnichenko, “Reabilitatsiia ta heroizatsiia.”
156 “Kolesnichenko vydav zbirnyk.” Solod’ko, “Iak Kolesnichenko oskandalyvsia.” “Kolesnichenko znovu potsupyv chuzhu pratsiu.”
157 Diukov, Vtorostepennyi vrag (two editions).
158 Bakanov, “Ni katsapa.”
2. Sources
The Increased Availability of Primary Sources
When I began my work as a historian in the early 1970s, conducting research was very different from what it is now. I wrote all my notes by hand on half-sheets of paper and all my bibliographic data on three-by-five index cards. I could photocopy texts and documents if I was working in the West, but photocopiers were not available in the communist bloc, where my most substantial research was undertaken. Microfilm and microfiche seemed to be the wave of the future, though now they seem mainly to take up valuable storage space in libraries and other repositories. I mention all this to underline just how different the world of research has become for scholars today. Had I been able to write this book, say, in the 1980s, my discussion of sources would have advanced from archive to archive, pointing out the relevant material that could be found in each.1 But now the physical location of documents