Mantle Convection and Surface Expressions. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Физика
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119528593
Скачать книгу
show that in composites with large strength contrast, texture reduction, or significant texture modification in the softer phase is linked to deformation heterogeneity in regions adjacent to the harder phase. In particular, stronger particles generate complex deformation geometries in surrounding regions, disrupting coherent texture formation in the softer phase.

      2.5.4 Texture Development in High Pressure Studies of Polyphase Aggregates

      In contrast to experiments on Brg + Fp in the DAC and NaMgF3 + NaCl aggregates in the D‐DIA, D‐DIA deformation experiments on CaGeO3 + MgO do observe texture development in MgO (Y. Wang et al., 2013). Notably the strength contrast between CaGeO3 and MgO (~2) is significantly lower than NaMgF3 and NaCl (~10) and similar or lower than Brg and Fp (~1.4‐4). This discrepancy may due strength contrast but also to the degree of anisotropy of the Pv phase. Both Brg and NaMgF3 are orthorhombic and exhibit a dominant slip plane that has no additional symmetric variants (of the plane). In Brg the dominant slip plane at room temperature appears to be (001) (e.g., Cordier et al., 2004; Miyagi & Wenk, 2016; Miyajima et al., 2009) or (100) at higher temperatures (Tsujino et al., 2016). In NaMgF3 Pv the dominant slip plane appears to be (100) (Kaercher et al., 2016). Thus, plastic anisotropy of these phases is relatively high. In contrast, CaGeO3 is close to cubic (pseudo‐cubic) and deform predominantly on the {110}〈1images0〉 slip system. This slip system has six symmetric variants and so plastic anisotropy is much lower than for Brg and NaMgF3 Pv. Thus, it is likely that the degree of plastic anisotropy of the harder phase plays an important role in controlling texture development in the softer phase. The modeling of Kaercher et al. (2016) shows that highly anisotropic NaMgF3 Pv grains impinge on NaCl grains and cause heterogeneous local stress‐strain fields around the soft NaCl grains. This causes the local stress–strain field to deviate from the macroscopic field, and since this varies from grain to grain, the NaCl phase does not develop “coherent” texture.

Schematic illustration of texture development during diamond anvil cell deformation of bridgmanite + ferropericlase synthesized from San Carlos olivine. Inverse pole figures for bridgmanite are shown in (a) and inverse pole figures for ferropericlase are shown in (b).

      Source: Miyagi & Wenk (2016).

      Clearly, large differences in rheological properties between two phases in an aggregate can result in heterogeneous deformation, even with relatively small amounts of the harder phase. Heterogeneous deformation of the softer phase can result in randomization of the softer phase. While many examples on metals and crustal rocks are aggregates where the soft phase is volumetrically dominant, in high‐pressure phases it appears that low‐symmetry hard phases that are volumetrically dominant can disrupt texture formation in the soft phase. However, systematic study of this phenomenon as a function of plastic anisotropy, microstructure, phase fractions, and strength contrast has not yet been undertaken.

      In polyphase mantle rock, complex interactions with respect to bulk strength are likely. At this point, it seems well established that Fp is weaker than Brg but the degree of this strength contrast is not fully constrained (Girard et al., 2016; Kraych et