22 Dodwell, M. and Newburn, M. (2010). Normal Birth as a Measure of Quality Care: Evidence on Safety, Effectiveness and Women's Experiences. London: NCT.
23 Dunkley‐Bent, J. (2018). A year of opportunity: continuity of carer. Midwives Spring: 68–69.
24 Foster, I.R. and Lasser, J. (2011). Professional Ethics in Midwifery Practice. London: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
25 Gallagher, A. (2017). Care ethics & nursing practice. In: Key Concepts & Issues in Nursing Ethics (ed. A. Scott), 55–68. Springer International Publications.
26 Gibbons, K. (2010). It's more than just talking. Midwives 13 (1): 36–37.
27 Griffiths, R. (2011). Key concepts in human rights and midwifery practice. British Journal of Midwifery 19 (11): 748–749.
28 Halfdansdottir, B., Wilson, M.E., Hildingsson, I. et al. (2015). Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18: 591–600.
29 Hall, P.J., Whitman Foster, J., Yount, K.M. et al. (2018). Keeping it together and falling apart: women's dynamic experience of birth. Midwifery 58: 130–136.
30 Halldorsdottir, S. and Karlsdottir, S.I. (2011). The primacy of the good midwife in midwifery services: an evolving theory of professionalism in midwifery. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 25 (4): 806–817.
31 Hastings‐Tolsma, M. and Nolte, A.G. (2014). Reconceptualising failure to rescue in midwifery: a concept analysis. Midwifery 30 (6): 585–594.
32 Hermansson, E. and Martensson, L. (2011). Empowerment in the midwifery context‐ a concept analysis. Midwifery 27: 811–816.
33 Janssen, B.K. and Wiegers, T.A. (2006). Strengths and weaknesses of midwifery care from the perspective of women. Evidence Based Midwifery 4 (2): 53–59.
34 Jefford, E. and Fahy, K. (2015). Midwives' clinical reasoning during second stage of labour: report on an interpretive study. Midwifery 31 (5): 519–525.
35 Jefford, E. and Jomeen, J. (2015). Midwifery abdication: a finding from an interpretive study. International Journal of Childbirth 5 (3): 116–125.
36 Jefford, E., Fahy, K., and Sundin, D. (2010). Decision‐making theories and their usefulness to the midwifery profession both in terms of midwifery practice and the education of midwives. International Journal of Nursing Practice 17: 246–253.
37 Jenkinson, B., Krushe, S., and Kildea, S. (2017). The experience of women, midwives and obstetricians when women decline recommended maternity care: the feminist thematic perspective. Midwifery 52: 1–10.
38 Jepsen, I., Mark, E., Nohr, E.A. et al. (2016). A qualitiative study of how caseload midwifery is constituted and experienced by Danish midwives. Midwifery 36: 61–69.
39 Johns, C. and Freshwater, D. (1998). Transforming Nursing through Reflective Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
40 Katz Rothman, B. (2013). Caught between autonomy and caring: still struggling towards an ethics of midwifery. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 23 (2): 143–150.
41 Leap, N. (2000). The less we do, the more we give. In: The Midwife‐Mother Relationship (ed. M. Kirkam). Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.
42 Lewis, J. (2019). Does shared decision making respect a patient's relational autonomy? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 25 (6): 1063–1069.
43 Linhares, C.H. (2012). The lived experience of midwives with spirituality in childbirth. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 57 (2): 165–171.
44 MacLellan, J. (2014). Claiming an ethics of care for midwives. Nursing Ethics 21 (7): 803–811.
45 McCormick, T.R. (2013). Principles of Bioethics. Ethics in Medicine. University of Washington, School of Medicine.
46 McCourt, C. and Stevens, T. (2009). Relationships and reciprocity in caseload midwifery. In: Emotions in Midwifery & Reproduction (eds. B. Hunter and R. Deery). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
47 Meadow, S. (2014). Defining the doula's role: fostering relational autonomy. Health Expectations 18: 3057–3068.
48 Medical Dictionary (2019). Empathy and Relexivity. In: The Free Dictionary https://medical‐dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/empathy/reflexivity (accessed 2 August 2019).
49 Midwifery (2020). Programme (2010) in Association with Department of Health & Social Care Midwifery 2020: Delivering Expectations. Cambridge: Jill Rogers Associates.
50 Moloney, S. and Gair, S. (2015). Empathy and spiritual carein midwifery practice: contributing to women's enhanced birth experiences. Women & Birth 28 (4): 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.04.009.
51 Morad, S., Parry‐Smith, W., and McSherry, W. (2013). Dignity in maternity care. Evidence Based Midwifery 11 (2): 67–70.
52 Newnham, E. and Kirkham, M. (2019). Beyond autonomy: care ethics for midwifery and the humanisation of birth. Nursing Ethics 26 (7–8): 2147–2157.
53 Newnham, E., McKellar, L., and Pincombe, J. (2017). “It's your body, but …” Mixed messages to childbirth education: findings from a hospital ethnography. Midwifery 55: 53–59.
54 NHS England (2016). Better Births: Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England: A Five Year Forward for Better Maternity Care. NHS England.
55 NHS England (2017). Implementing Better Births: Continuity of carer. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2017/12/implementing‐better‐births.pdf (accessed 23 January 2019).
56 Nicholls, L. and Webb, C. (2006). What makes a good miwife? An integrative reviw of methodologically‐diverse research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56 (4): 414–429.
57 Nieuwenhuijze, M.J., Korstjens, I., de Jonge, A. et al. (2014). On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision‐making in maternity care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14: 223.
58 NMC (2018). Code of Professional Conduct. London: The Nursing and Midwifery Council Publications.
59 Noseworthy, D.A., Phibbs, R.A., and Benn, C.A. (2013). Towards a relational model of decision‐making in midwifery care. Midwifery 29 (7): e42–e48.
60 Overgaard, C., Fenger‐Gron, M., and Sandall, J. (2014). The impact of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care. Social Science & Medicine 74 (7): 973–981.
61 Pembroke, N.F. and Pembroke, J.J. (2008). The spirituality of presence in midwifery care. Midwifery 24: 321–327.
62 Prainsack, B. and Buyx, A. (2011). Solodarity: Reflections on an Emerging Concept in Bioethics. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
63 Raynor, M. and England, C. (2010). Psychology for Midwives: Pregnancy, Birth and Puerperium. London: Open University press.
64 Reed, R., Rowe, J., and Barnes, M. (2016). Midwifery practice during birth: ritual companionship. Women and Birth 29: 269–278.
65 Renfew, M.J., Dyson, L., Herbet, G. et al. (2008). Developing evidence based recommendations in public health: incorporating the views of practitioners, service users and user representatives. Health Expectations 11 (1): 3–15.
66 Rodgers, B.L. (1989). Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. Journal of Advanced Nursing 14: 330–335.
67 Ross‐Davie, M. and Cheyne, H. (2014). Intrapartum support: what do women want? A literature review. Evidence Based Midwifery 12 (2): 52–58.
68 Royal College of Midwives (2017). Can continuity work for us? A resource for midwives. London: Royal College of Midwives Publication.
69 Sandall, J. (2017). The Contribution of Continuity of Midwifery Care to High Quality Maternity Care. London: Royal College of Midwives.
70 Sandall,