Remote Patient Management in Peritoneal Dialysis. Группа авторов. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: Ingram
Серия: Contributions to Nephrology
Жанр произведения: Медицина
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9783318064773
Скачать книгу
without costly and cumbersome machinery. Moreover, CAPD was preferred because of its better results in terms of treatment adequacy [3, 4]. This was the state of art until the 1980s when new generation cycler became available, spurring a renewed interest in APD.

      Evolution of Cyclers

      At the end of 1980s, cyclers underwent progressive improvement in terms of hardware components and layout, making APD safer, quieter, and less bulky. This is the case of Pac-X and its upgraded version Pac-XTRA produced by Baxter, PCS 2000 by Fresenius and PD 100 T from Gambro. This generation of cyclers utilized disposable materials and allowed individualization of dialysis by personalized prescription of intraperitoneal volume and dwell time. These machines allowed to perform different APD treatment schedules such as intermittent PD, nightly intermittent PD, continuous cyclic PD, and even tidal volume prescription (TPD).

Img

      Other companies produced APD machine with similar features, such as the PD night equipment and its upgraded version, the Sleep Safe (FMC, Bad Homburg, Germany), the PD 100T, PD 101, PD 200 and Serena (Gambro, Lund, Sweden). The last version of all these machines presented similar features such as data recording (60–180 days of treatment), possibility to prescribe total dialysate volume, exchange fill volume, tidal percentage and time. Sleep Safe and Serena also allowed deciding the dwell time and number of cycles. Sleep Safe was equipped with a system for the automatic detection of the type of bag, avoiding possible mistakes in bag selection. It also allowed profiling glucose percentage at each cycle. All machines were permitted to use solutions of other companies through adaptors. They were different in the way they moved and measured fluid volumes. Pneumatic and hydraulic pumps were used by HOMECHOICE Pro and Sleep Safe, respectively, while Serena incorporated a pressure chamber. Both HOMECHOICE Pro and Sleep Safe used a volumetric system to measure fluids, while Serena used a gravity-based system. In addition, Serena also allowed prescription in breakpoint modality, varying the tidal percentage depending on the drainage flow rate: when the drainage flow started to become too slow (30–60 mL/min), a new fill cycle started, provided a pre-set cut off volume had been achieved. This modality optimized drainage and avoided spending too much time in the last part of the exchange to drain only 15–25% of the residual intraperitoneal volume.

      The most recent cyclers (HOMECHOICE CLARIA with the variants AMIA and KAGUYA, Baxter, Dirfield, IL, USA, and Sleep Safe Harmony, FMC, Bad Homburg, Germany) present significant innovation, mostly related to the software components (allowing new treatment schedules) and the bidirectional communication features (allowing true implementation of telemedicine and RPM).

      HOMECHOICE CLARIA/SHARESOURCE Revolution

      A true revolution of PD occurred with the advent of real-time bidirectional communication between the cycler at patient’s home and the hospital care team. This is today offered by the new HOMECHOICE CLARIA equipped with the cloud-based SHARESOURCE platform (Baxter, Dirfield, IL, USA). Physicians and nurses can verify and change the dialysis prescription by a simple login to the SHARESOURCE platform, while patients can stay out-of-hospital avoiding long and time-consuming travels to the PD center. There is no need to bring data cards for the periodic scheduled consultation since data are constantly supervised by the care team.

      Conclusion and