One of the most curious features in the evidence for the Anthropocene involves the common domestic broiler chicken, the source of everything from buffalo wings to pre‐sliced deli meat chicken sandwiches. While thus far no individual taxa have been suggested as the distinct marker of the Anthropocene, Bennett et al. (2018) propose Gallus gallus domesticus as the best choice. Driving the rise and global spread of this heavily engineered bird are human population growth, commercially impacted human consumption trends, and drops in the populations of wild animals. It is now by far the most numerous bird species around, with an estimated population of almost 23 billion individuals. This is an order of magnitude larger than stocks of the most abundant existing wild bird species, such as house sparrows, common pigeons, and red‐billed quelea, as well as the extinct passenger pigeon, and is likely the largest population size ever achieved by a single species in the 160 million‐year history of birds. Because of selective industrial breeding, the broiler chicken is distinctive in overall size, weight, bone size, genetic make‐up, and appearance from its wild progenitor, the red jungle fowl. In 2016, over 65 billion broilers were consumed globally. Production and consumption data mean “that the potential rate of carcass accumulation of chickens is unprecedented in the natural world” (Bennett et al. 2018). Much of this global accumulation finds its way into landfill sites by way of domestic garbage removal systems. Organic materials like chicken bones are often well preserved in landfills because their anaerobic conditions tend to mummify organic deposits (Rathje & Murphy 2001). Consequently, the broiler chicken produces a particularly widely distributed and distinctive biostratigraphic signal in the sedimentary record, allowing it to serve as a key fossil index taxon of the Anthropocene.
While the ICS has not recognized the Anthropocene (Finney & Edwards 2016; Gibbard 2018), many scientists have. The concept has gained de facto authority even if it is not officially sanctioned, as reflected in the launching of multiple new academic journals, such as The Anthropocene, The Anthropocene Review, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, and Anthropocene Coasts, the organization of professional conferences sponsored by universities and scholarly groups, and the publication of an ever‐growing international and multidisciplinary scientific literature on the topic (e.g., Zalasiewicz et al. 2017; Hughes et al. 2018; Steffen et al. 2018; Tucker et al. 2018).
Ultimately, whether or not the ICS decides that the Anthropocene meets the criteria for the establishment of an epoch in Earth history, it does not change the reality of the “perfect storm” of interacting human impacts on the planet, its global processes and ecosystems, and its lifeforms. For those at gravest risk from ecocrises interaction, whether their loss of access to adequate food, breathable air, survivable temperatures, or dry land occurs during a particular scientifically defined segment of geological time on ICS’ International Chronostratigraphic Chart is of negligible importance. What does matter is the utility of Anthropocene recognition in spurring useful new research and practical political and social action to avert a slide into hothouse Earth conditions.
1.11 The hottest year on record
Most significant among the ecological crises Earthlings now face is global warming. Earth’s temperature has risen by 1.4 °F over the last 100 years, and is predicted to rise to 11.5 °F in the next few decades. Despite various disagreements about regional and temporal variations in temperature, the vast majority of climate scientists recognize both that the planet is getting hotter and that fossil fuel technology is playing a fundamental role in this risky process. Today, the carbon dioxide level in the atmosphere is the greatest it has been in 400 000 years, having jumped from about 280 parts per million (ppm) before the Industrial Revolution to about 410 ppm today. In the final report of The Lancet Commission on Managing the Health Effects of Climate Change (Costello et al. 2009), the warming of Earth was labeled “the biggest global health threat of the 21st century,” a conclusion affirmed by the Commission in 2015 (Watts et al. 2015). The WHO (2018) estimates there will be approximately 250 000 additional deaths due to climate change per year between 2030 and 2050, due to malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea, and heat stress. People living in coastal regions, megacities, island communities, and mountainous and polar regions are particularly vulnerable, especially children and elderly people. Notably, disproportionate morbidity and mortality rises due to climate change will affect the poorest and least powerful global citizens (Singer 2018).
The hottest year on record was 2016, with 2014, 2015, 2017, and 2018 representing the next four hottest since the measurement of annual records began 139 years ago. As Climate Central (2018) points out “[w]ith the five warmest years occurring during the past five years—and the 20 warmest occurring over the past 22—a consistent warming trend couldn’t be clearer.” The trend continues. June of 2019 was the warmest June ever recorded. For climate scientists like Sarah Green, an environmental chemist at Michigan Technological University, “[a]t this point, the inexorable increase in global temperatures is entirely predictable” (quoted in Kaufman 2019).
1.12 Organization of this book
The following chapters lay out an environmental health approach to ecocrises interaction that is informed by anthropology, ecology, climate science, history, and political economy. This begins in Chapter 2 with a dive into the intricacies of planetary ecosystems and the rise of the field of ecological study. Under consideration is the nature of nature, specifically the interrelationships among species in an environmental context, as well as biodiversity and environmental regional and planet‐wide structures (e.g., air currents, hydraulics). Chapter 3 examines the social, economic, and technological bases of the contemporary environmental crisis, including the role played by the ongoing development of capitalism and the growth of a class of wealthy polluting elites, who represent the primary drivers of catastrophic environmental pollution. Chapter 4 provides an overview of the environment catastrophe unfolding during the Anthropocene, including the patterns of sweeping change reshaping life on the planet: pollution of the water, the air, and the land; habitat restructuring and ecological simplification; species movement; and species die‐offs and extinctions. Chapter 5 offers a specific investigation of the major environmental crises endangering Earth as our planetary home, including the manifold expressions of contemporary environmental disruption. Building on this background, Chapter 6 explores the nature and threat of ecocrises interaction and presents several case studies of the physical, chemical, and biological factors involved in these perilous processes. Chapter 7 addresses the mechanisms and pathways of adverse interaction. Chapter