QUIJANO, A. (2000a). Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social. Journal of World Systems Research, 6(2), 342-386.
QUIJANO, A. (2000b). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina. En E. Lander (comp.), La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas (pp. 122-151). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
QUIJANO, A. (2014). Cuestiones y horizontes. De la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
RAHMAN, M. (2015). Sexual diffusions and conceptual confusions: Muslim homophobia and muslim homosexualities in the context of modernity. En M. Lavinas Picq y M. Thiel (eds.), Sexualities in World Politics. How LGBTQ Claims Shape International Relations (pp. 92-107). Oxon: Routledge.
RAHMAN, M. (2018). Postcolonialism and International Relations: Intersections of sexualities, religion and race. En R. Perseaud y A. Sajed (eds.), Race, Gender, and Culture in International Relations. Postcolonial Perspectives (pp. 99-115). Oxon: Routledge.
SAID, E. W. (2003 [1978]). Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. Londres London: Penguin Books.
SAKAR, B. K. (1919). Hindu theory of International Relations. The American Political Science Review, 13(3), 400-414.
SALTER, M. B. (2010). Edward Said and post-colonial international relations. En C. Moore y C. Farrands (eds.), International Relations Theory and Philosophy (pp. 129-143). London: Routledge.
SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) (2019). Recuperado de: https://www.scimagojr.com/
SENGHOR, L. S. (1964). Liberté 1: négritude et humanisme. Paris: Le Seuil.
SETH, S. (1998). Postcolonial studies: a beginning. Postcolonial Studies, 1(1), 7-11.
SETH, S. (2011). Postcolonial theory and the critique of international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(1), 167-183.
SETH, S. (ed.) (2013). Postcolonial Theory and International Relations. A critical Introduction. Oxon: Routledge.
SHEPHERD, L. J. (2008). Power and authority in the production of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. International Studies Quarterly, 52(2), 383-404.
SPIVAK, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? En C. Nelson y L. Grossberg (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
SPIVAK, G. C. (2000). Can the subaltern speak? En D. Brydon (ed.), Postcolonialism: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Studies (vol. IV, pp.1427-1477). London: Routledge.
SUBRAHMANYAN, S. (2016). L'éléphant, le canon et le pinceau. Paris: Alma Editeur.
TICKNER, A. (2008). Latin American IR and the Primacy of lo práctico, International Studies Review, 10(4), 735-748.
TICKNER, J. A. (1988). Hans Morgenhau's principles of political realism: A feminist reformulation. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 429-440.
TICKNER, J. A. (2001). Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia Press University.
TICKNER, J. A. (2014). A Feminist Voyage Through International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TICKNER, A. y BLANEY, D. (eds.) (2012). Thinking International Relations Differently. London: Routledge.
TICKNER, A. y WÆVER, O. (eds.) (2009). International Relations Scholarship Around the World. Abingdon: Routledge.
TRUE, J. (2003). Mainstreaming gender in global public policy. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5(3), 368-396.
TURNER, O. y NYMALM, N. (2019). Morality and progress: IR narratives on international revisionism and the status quo. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1623173
VELA ORBEGOZO, B. (2010). Contribución al debate sobre la formación del Estado colombiano en el Siglo XIX. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
VITALIS, R. (2015). White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations – The United States in the World. New York: Cornell University Press.
WALTZ, K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41.
WEBER, C. (2014). The Gentrification of International Theory. Recuperado de http://www.isanet.org/publications/isq/posts/id/313/The-Gentrification-of-International-Theory
WEMHEUER-VOGELAAR, W., BELL, N. J., NAVARRETE MORALES, M. y TIERNEY, M. J. (2016). The IR of the beholder: Examining global IR using the 2014 TRIP survey. International Studies Review, 18(1), 16-32.
YANG, Y. (2018). Escape both the “Thucydides Trap” and the Churchill Trap”: Finding a third type of great power relations under the bipolar system. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(2), 193-235. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poy002
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.