129 120
130 121
131 122
132 123
133 124
134 125
135 126
136 127
137 128
138 129
139 130
140 131
141 132
142 133
143 134
144 135
145 136
146 137
147 138
148 139
149 140
150 141
151 142
152 143
153 144
154 145
155 146
156 147
157 148
158 149
159 150
160 151
161 152
162 153
163 154
164 155
165 156
166 157
167 158
168 159
169 160
170 161
171 162
172 163
173 164
174 165
175 166
176 167
177 168
178 169
179 170
180 171
181 172
182 173
183 174
184 175
185 176
186 177
187 178
188 179
189 180
190 181
191 182
192 183
193 184
194 185
195 186
196 187
197 188
198 189
199 190
200 191
201 192
202 193
203 194
204 195
205 196
206 197
207 198
208 199
209 200
210 201
211 202
212 203
213 204
214 205
215 206
216 207
217 208
218 209
219 210
220 211
221 212
222 213
223 214
224 215
225 216
226 217
227 218
228 219
229 220
230 221
231 222
232 223
233 224
“Just Deserts is a delight: a sharp and interesting discussion of punishment, morality, choice, and much else. It hits the sweet spot; it’s wonderfully clear and accessible – perfect for a newcomer to the free will debates – but also deep and subtle, with plenty to engage experts in the field.”
Paul Bloom, Brooks and Suzanne Ragen Professor of Psychology, Yale University, and author of Against Empathy
“What it means to make a choice, to deserve praise or blame, to do the right thing – these are all at stake in the debate over free will. Here you will find two different viewpoints, elaborated and defended by true masters. Given the sharpness of both interlocutors, neither has anywhere to hide; a wide spectrum of important points is laid out for careful consideration.”
Sean Carroll, author of The Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself
“This is a very lively, engaging, and thoughtful debate between two well-informed and insightful philosophers. It is written in a very accessible style, and students and even scholars in other disciplines or sub-fields of philosophy will learn from it and find themselves drawn in. It does not just re-hash traditional debates, but pushes the frontiers outward. Highly recommended.”
John Martin Fischer, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at UC Riverside
“A philosophical debate in the grand style. Caruso and Dennett play in the philosophical equivalent of a three set tennis championship where the prize is whether free will exists or not and what this means for reward, punishment, and the criminal law. Serve, volley, amazing gets, overheads, long rallies, a few trick shots, several match points. Really smart play from two philosophers at the top of their games.”
Owen Flanagan, James B. Duke Distinguished