Figure 4.25 The achromatic doublet.
The first element, often (on account of its shape) referred to as the ‘crown element’, is a high power positive lens with low dispersion. The second element is a low power negative lens with high dispersion. The focal lengths of the two elements are f1 and f2 respectively and their Abbe numbers V1 and V2. Since the intention is that the dispersions of the two elements should entirely cancel, this condition constrains the relative power of the two elements. Individually, the dispersion as measured by the difference in optical power between the red and blue wavelengths is proportional to the reciprocal of the focal power and the Abbe number for each element. Therefore:
From Eq. (4.51), it is clear that the ratio of the two focal lengths should be minus the inverse of the ratio of their respective Abbe numbers. In other words, the ratio of their powers should be minus the ratio of their Abbe numbers. The power of the system comprising the two lenses is, in the thin lens approximation, simply equal to the sum of their individual powers. Therefore, it is possible to calculate these individual focal lengths, f1 and f2, in terms of the desired system focal length of f:
Thus, the two focal lengths are simply given by:
In the thin lens approximation, therefore, light will be focused at the same point for the red and blue wavelengths. Consequentially, in this approximation, this system will be free from both longitudinal and transverse chromatic aberration. The simplicity of this approach may be illustrated in a straightforward worked example.
Worked Example 4.6 Simple Achromatic Doublet
We wish to construct and achromatic doublet with a focal length of 200 mm. The two glasses to be used are: SCHOTT N-BK7 for the positive crown lens and SCHOTT SF2 for the negative lens. Both these glasses feature on the Abbe diagram in Figure 4.24 and the Abbe number for these glasses are 64.17 and 33.85 respectively. The individual focal lengths may be calculated using Eq. (4.52):
Therefore, the focal length of the first ‘crown lens’ should be 94.5 mm and the focal length of the second diverging lens should be −179 mm.
Thus far, the analysis design of an achromatic doublet has been fairly elementary. In the previous worked example, we have constrained the focal lengths of the two lens elements to specific values. However, we are still free to choose the shape of each lens. That is to say, there are two further independent variables that can be adjusted. Achromatic doublets can either be cemented or air spaced. In the case of the cemented doublet, as presented in Figure 4.25, the second surface of the first lens must have the same radius as the first surface of the second lens. This provides an additional constraint; thus, for the cemented doublet, there is only one additional free variable to adjust. However, introduction of an air space between the two lenses removes this constraint and gives the designer an extra degree of freedom to play with. That said, the cemented doublet does offer greater robustness and reliability with respect to changes in alignment and finds very wide application as a standard optical component.
As a ‘stock component’ achromatic doublets are designed, generally, for the infinite conjugate. For cemented doublets, with the single additional degree of design freedom, these components are optimised to have zero spherical aberration at the central wavelength. This is an extremely important consideration, for not only are these doublets free of chromatic aberration, but they are also well optimised for other aberrations. Commercial doublets are thus extremely powerful optical components.
4.7.5 Optimisation of an Achromatic Doublet (Infinite Conjugate)
An air spaced achromatic doublet may be optimised to eliminate both spherical aberration and coma. The fundamental power of the wavefront approach in describing third order aberration is reflected in the ability to calculate the total system aberration as the sum of the aberration of the two lenses. In the thin lens approximation, we may simply use Eqs. (4.30a) and (4.30b) to express the spherical aberration and coma contribution for each lens element. We simply ascribe a variable shape parameter, s1 and s2 to each of the two lenses. The two conjugate parameters are fixed. In the particular case of a doublet designed for the infinite conjugate, the conjugate parameter for the first lens, t1, is −1. In the case of the second lens, the conjugate parameter, t2, is determined by the relative focal lengths of the two lenses and thus fixed by the ratio of the two Abbe numbers and, from Eq. (4.52), we get:
Without going through the algebra in detail, it is clear that having determined both t1 and t2, Eqs. (4.30a) and (4.30b) give us two expressions solely in terms of s1 and s2. These expressions for the spherical aberration and coma must be set to zero and can be solved for both s1 and s2. The important point to note about this procedure is that because Eq. 4.30a contains terms that are quadratic in shape factor, this is also reflected in the final solution. Therefore, in general, we might expect to find two solutions to the equation and this, in general, is true.
Worked Example 4.7 Detailed Design of 200 mm Focal Length Achromatic Doublet
At this point we illustrate the design of an air spaced achromat by looking more closely at the previous example where we analysed a 200 mm achromat design. We are to design an achromat with a focal length of 200 mm working at the infinite conjugate, using SCHOTT N-BK7 and SCHOTT SF2 as the two glasses, with the less dispersive N-BK7 used as the positive ‘crown’ element. Again, the Abbe numbers for these glasses are 64.17 and 33.85 respectively and the nd values (refractive index at 589.6 nm) 1.5168 and 1.647 69. From the previous example, we know that focal lengths of the two lenses are:
The two conjugate parameters are straightforward to determine. The first conjugate parameter, t1, is naturally −1. Eq.