Subjects: LCSH: Environmentalism--Political aspects. | Environmental protection--Political aspects. | Environmental policy.
Classification: LCC JA75.8 .D488 2020 (print) | LCC JA75.8 (ebook) | DDC 363.7--dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019029829 LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019029830
The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.
Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.
For further information on Polity, visit our website: politybooks.com
Acknowledgements
Writing a book is in some ways a solitary activity, but it wouldn’t be possible without a community. I am grateful to be embedded in several communities without which this book wouldn’t have been possible. The first is the Environmental Studies Department at Wellesley College, a collaborative community of faculty, students, and staff in which most of the ideas presented here first emerged, both inside and outside of the classroom. I know from experience that not all academic units are as supportive and friendly as my current one is, and I’m beyond grateful for fascinating colleagues and smart students. (And for smart colleagues and fascinating students, too.)
I also benefit from being a part of the Environmental Studies Section of the International Studies Association, another set of scholars who both challenge and encourage each other. A related community is the Teaching Global Environmental Politics (GEP-ED) listserv, where queries about things such as environmental successes or publisher marketing surveys are quickly and helpfully answered, and I learn from listening to the various debates that others bring. I am not a natural networker, and the fact that people around the world who study and teach the kinds of things I do are people I want to hang out with makes our collective engagement much less instrumental and much more enjoyable.
Thanks are also due to several individuals: thanks to Louise Knight at Polity Press for pitching the idea of this book to me. I wouldn’t have thought to propose it, but once she asked I realized I had some strong opinions on what environmental politics is, and isn’t, and I thought that it would be fun to communicate them. It has been. Bridget Peak provided excellent research assistance and also feedback on an earlier draft of the book. Sammy Barkin reads and comments on everything I write, and all my ideas and information are better because of his feedback. Lynda Warwick is the perfect non-academic audience for my thoughts and one of my favorite people. She helps make sure I can communicate academic work to nonspecialists and also just generally helps me cope with life. As does Zoë, whose main contribution to this book involved competing with my computer for lap space and ensuring that I do my big picture thinking on lots of long walks.
CHAPTER 1 Defining Environmental Politics
Why is it so difficult to prevent, or fix, problems of pollution? Why do we continually harvest or extract natural resources at unsustainable rates, even though these activities cause known harm to both people and ecosystems? Why do environmental problems frequently harm groups of people who are already the most vulnerable and least powerful?
Addressing environmental issues isn’t primarily an issue of science or information. Despite uncertainty about some details, we frequently understand the basic processes by which environmental problems happen, at least once we discover them. Responding to – or even creating – environmental problems requires political decisions: choices by governments (and others) about how to allocate resources and prioritize tradeoffs among different social values. These political decisions involve advocacy by groups with various priorities and different levels of political influence. This political process, which can be difficult enough for many social issues, faces particular challenges when addressing the environment.
Environmental politics is the study of how societies make decisions about resource use, pollution, or economic activities that influence the condition of the environment. These processes frequently, but not always, take place within government institutions. They involve or affect people from many economic and social sectors. Preventing or addressing environmental problems requires accurately diagnosing the characteristics of these problems and understanding the political processes for making rules about the activities that cause them.
What is the Environment?
For a term that is so frequently used, it can be surprisingly difficult to pin down what “the environment” means. Some people use it to refer to nature and the various amenities that nature provides: plants, animals, soils, air, water, even sunlight. But the concept is broader than that and changes as we imagine different human activities and learn more about global systems, from the smallest to the largest scale. We now understand the importance of microbes and of the stratospheric ozone layer in protecting life on earth. At the same time, human constructs such as buildings and cities, or practices such as agriculture or industrialization, form part of what we are thinking of when we talk about the environment.
What we are generally discussing when we look at the environment is how human activity influences it, and is influenced by it. One useful framing is to think of the environment in this context as being partly about pollution, which occurs when contaminants or other unwanted substances are introduced (usually unintentionally) into air, water, or land as a byproduct of other activity. It is also partly about the use of resources, things taken out of their environmental context for human use. These resources may be renewable or non-renewable.
Pollution is pervasive. It includes everything from waste dumped intentionally into the ocean to fumes from factory smokestacks to agricultural runoff into rivers. We can even speak of light pollution or noise pollution to refer to unwanted intrusions into our surroundings that affect the wellbeing of people or other species.
Some pollution is obvious. We can see or smell it. We may know its causes and be able to feel its effects. Other types of pollution, however, are less apparent. Water that is contaminated by lead or other heavy metals may be toxic to people and animals, but it may look or taste no different than clean water. Greenhouse gases – carbon dioxide and other emissions that contribute to global climate change – are substances that, on their own, aren’t necessarily harmful to breathe. Collectively they nevertheless contribute to the overall warming of the planet and the many related effects such as drought and sea-level rise. The chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) that contributed to the destruction of the ozone layer were non-toxic and stable and invisible in the air. Pollution, in other words, is defined by the harm it causes, but we may not always be aware of that harm when we are creating or experiencing it.
Natural resources also form a part of what we think of as the environment. Overuse of natural resources is an important category of environmental problems. Some natural resources are what we call “non-renewable.” On human time-scales the earth will not make any more of these materials than currently exist. Non-renewable resources include things such as fossil fuels – the coal, oil, and gas that are so central to our energy use – as well as minerals such as copper and tin, or even the rare earth elements (for example, neodymium) that are important in our cell phones and other technology.
Other types of natural resources – such as fish or forests – are what we call “renewable.” You’d think that use of renewable resources would be less problematic than use of non-renewable resources. After all, if you leave enough fish or trees around, they make more